User talk:Sue Colombo

Welcome!

Hello, Sue Colombo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Audioestudio, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Audioestudio


A tag has been placed on Audioestudio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Audioestudio
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Audioestudio. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

March 2012
I suggest you look at FAQ/Organizations, and perhaps also at Notability and Notability (organizations and companies) to get an idea of what is required to establish that a business is notable enough to be the subject of an article. I strongly recommend not recreating the article Audioestudio yet again unless you can demonstrate that it satisfies Wikipedia's notability requirements, as doing so is likely to lead to your being blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi Sue, thank you for your email. Please read this, and note that personal attacks on other editors can lead to a block from editing. I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. The fact that a company exists does not necessarily make it notable, and the only sources you gave were the company's own.

Just reposting the same page is bound to lead to repeated deletion, and removing deletion tags is ineffective since a bot replaces them. It is better to engage with other editors to see if there is a way forward, preferably without offensive language. I note that all your edits relate to this company, and I wonder if you have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject? If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage of the topic in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. Alternatively, you could create a draft  here and get someone to take a look before seeking to repost  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  06:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I see that you decided to ignore my advice above, and recreated the article without providing any new evidence of notability. I gave you that advice because, after years of experience of working on Wikipedia, I knew that the result of reposting it would probably be that the article would be deleted and protected against being created again, which would actually make it more difficult for you to create a more suitable article if and when you do find suitable evidence of notability. Here is one more piece of advice, also based on years of experience of how Wikipedia works. If you either continue to create articles without evidence of notability, or behave in uncivil ways towards other editors, or in any other way fail to act cooperatively, there is a serious likelihood that you will be blocked from editing. Please do feel free to drop me a friendly note on my talk page if you want any further advice or help. Wikipedia can be frustrating for a new editor, unused to how it works, and I am willing to help make your experience smoother if I can. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)