User talk:Suech

A tag has been placed on Easeus Data Recovery Wizard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berean Hunter (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Easeus Data Recovery Wizard
A tag has been placed on Easeus Data Recovery Wizard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The article also was prevoiusly deleted as part of an AfD debate. Recreating such an article violates Wikipedia policy. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/EASEUS (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 03:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * one week block. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 15:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Logo-1-.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Logo-1-.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 20:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)  -- Nan oha A's Yu ri     Talk, My master 20:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)