User talk:Sufur Xam

Speedy deletion nomination of Faiz Imran
Hello, Sufur Xam,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Faiz Imran, for deletion, because [|a consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Faiz Imran


The page Faiz Imran has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the feedback.

To avoid running into the same or similar problems in future, could you pls pinpoint what portion or feature of the article "seemed to be unambiguous advertising"?

Thank you. Sufur Xam (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Sufur Xam (talk) 18:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I do not have and I never had a separate account that was banned. You could have attempted verifying this separately before stating G5 as one of the reasons for deleting the page.

Pls verify and let me know how else I may have done wrong so I can avoid such in my subsequent contributions.

Thank you. Sufur Xam (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Sufur Xam (talk) 19:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

How did you come to write about Faiz Imran? As noted, we are aware that he has asked others to do what you did. Can you at least concede that it isn't unreasonable for us to think what we think? Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Definitely, it is not unreasonable to think so.

I however think it is unfair to block me on the basis of such "thoughts", especially when I asked to know if I breached any rule, so I could avoid such in my subsequent contributions. Thank you.

Sufur Xam (talk) 20:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You didn't answer 331dot's first question: how'd you wind up writing about Imran? only (talk) 20:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

I have intentionally avoided that for the sake of my privacy. For a hint, I got to know about him as a follower of one of his business partners on social media, who also has a page on this platform. I checked to find further information about him with a Google search and realized he currently has no page here unlike his other partners and thought to create one from the information I could glean from internet sources. Thank you.

Sufur Xam (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)