User talk:Sugaar/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!. Mikkalai 01:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

For making one title go directly to another, see Redirects. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 05:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

White people & turks
Ive read trough some of the stuff that youve been writing in the article about white people. One thing especially made me react; you said that turks are close to greeks ethnically... What? Would you please provide a source? If you would ask any professor about this I bet you would get a curious gaze at you. Turks are decendants from nomadic tribes in asia minor while greeks are an indo-european people. Further ive been to both Greece and Turkey, and sure in southern Greece the people start looking more and more like turks but in the north they look nothing like turks. Alot of the greeks there had blue/grey eyes and some had blonde hair. However in turkey everyone has brown eyes and black hair. And EVEN further, troughout history turks and greeks have seen each other as enemies and not as brethren. So please do provide a source. --DerMeister 21:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging
Hi there! I was just enjoying your Image:European Middle Neolithic.gif when I noticed that it lacks an image copyright tag. I notice you say it's free to use, but we have tags so that it's clear exactly how free they are. It'd be great if you could peruse the available copyright tags and label your images (most people use either PD-self or GFDL-self). There's a recent push to delete untagged images as it's a legal weak point for the Wikimedia Foundation, and I'd hate for us to lose such useful maps. &mdash; Laura Scudder | Talk 01:25, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Solved. --Sugaar 15:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Anbotoko Mari / Mari (goddess)
I've followed your suggestion, the main article is now at Mari (goddess). Could you please check in at Talk:Mari (goddess) and indicate if you still have a problem with how this is structured? - Jmabel | Talk 04:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Have you heard of Hank Wesselman? You might like the guy's work, considering your interest in prehistory, psychadelics for spiritual discovery, and other interesting things. I had him as a teacher for an anthropology class on Magic, Witchcraft, and Religion and he was pretty cool. He talked a bit about psychadelic use and such. Also, I see your an anarchist in Basque, and so I wanted to know your take on the Basque seperatist movement. I don't know much about it, and like lots of world movements, it's hard to judge from the outside, especially living in America with the horrible media we get here. The Ungovernable Force 05:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it's always curious to know about such individuals. But guess I'm just way too rationalist to believe in Nainoa or whatever... but it's a good story anyhow. Enjoy. --Sugaar 11:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

European exploration of Africa
Great job man! Vale! The Ogre 01:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Help Bizkaia!
There is a big dispute in the Biscay page. A Miami user (User:Miamitom) is trying to get all the searches for "Vizcaya" to the page he has created about "Villa Vizcaya" in Miami. Another user created a disambig page, but he keeps on adding "Villa Vizcaya" article content to the disambig page. He is doing all he can to put this article as the main article for "Vizcaya". Right now he is doing vandalism on Biscay. What can we do? how do we report this vandalism? David 13:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello
You commented on my request to be unblocked and you denied it. The reason I was asking to be unblocked was because someone was blocked with an IP address the same as mine. It prevented me from making edits too. I also requested it more then 15 days ago and since then forgot about it. I have been able to make edits since then.
 * I didn't do that (at least I don't think I did). All I did was to try to post a comment to your discussion page and it did not appear. I've tried again with the same result.
 * Hold on a second! I actually wrote in the banner. Well, don't nlame me: I tried to post a new comment. Just that. --Sugaar 00:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

You wrote "Erge? == I just realized that you added Erge in the Basque mythology article, as a minor character. I must say I have never heard of it and, in first sight, I thought of vandalism. Where did you get that information from?"

First off I got my information from http://www.mythome.org/miscurl.html#Basques. I'm not sure if it's 100% accurate but it appears to be accurate and I didn't vandalize the page.
 * It's good that it's sourced. I just had never heard of this one. --Sugaar 00:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Second, I made the edit about Erge at least as far back as Dec 2005 maybe even farther.
 * I know. But I didn't realize before. I'm not usually so active keeping an eye on the pages I create/edit. --Sugaar 00:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Finally, are you saying you blocked me because I'm not blocked right now nor have I gotten a warning about vandalism. NeoJustin 21:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No. I can't block anyone. I'm totally ignorant on the issue of your blocking. And have no opinion on that.
 * In fact I understood that the banner was about another user some Progrocker1991 or whatever. All this Wikibureucracy is a mess, don't you think? --Sugaar 00:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello Sugaar.
I see you contribute in Wiki. I am now contributing in some articles. One in the English people's page. Now there is incredible new evidence from the emergence of populations genetics that is myth shattering. Read the discussion page in the English people's page and the Scottish people's page. We are now discussing two epoch making books. Blood of the Isles, by Brian Sykes and Origns of Britons, by Oppenheimer, both recognized among the present leading population geneticsts of our time. The problem is that, in consonance with the latest research in population genetics, it destroys the Anglo-Saxon myth and the Nordic Myth and a lot of people in the British people's pages do not want to post verifiable and reputable information in their peoples' pages about that issue, which goes clearly against all Wiki principles. But you know, since anyone can edit this site, they keep deleting verifiable, updated and incredibly important information. Just have a look at the English people and the Scottish people discussion page and tell me your opinion. Veritas et Severitas 00:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC).
 * I've replied in your own talk page, with a useful paper and my own clinal reconstruction based on it. I can't guarantee that I will be able to keep at pace with those articles but I will try to post in the talk pages as well. Thanks for your trust. --Sugaar 09:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * User:LSLM is actually distorting the facts quite dramatically. Firstly the paper you have refered to several times, A Y chromosome census of the British Isles is extensively cited in the English people article. The Welsh people article states quite clearly that most Welsh people are mainly derived from the paleolithic population of Europe, that expanded out of Iberia at the end of the last major glaciation. Indeed both English people and Welsh people make note of the fact that R1b is the most extensive Y chromosome haplogroup in the population. The articles have all of this information available already, and are supported by proper scientific peer reviewed papers, to claim that there is some conspiracy to avoid mentioning this information displays breathtaking arrogance, it's already there. LSLM seems to want to construct some sort of bond between British and Spanish people that simply does not exist, I have had to mention to him several times that it is absurd to call the Iberian peninsula of seven millenia ago Spain. Spain did not exist at this time. He keeps conflating political institutions (states like Spain) with geographical areas (like Iberia), and he keeps calling these paleolithic people Celtic. It is extremely confusing, both for people trying to debate with him, and I suspect for himself. Indeed the reason that I keep removing LSLM's edit is because he keeps citing the popular press (in breach of wikipedia guidelines for science), rather than reputable scientific sources. (see here) LSLM is claiming something that is just not true, that this information is not mentioned in the pages, but it is. It is also incorrect to claim that Sykes's book Blood of the Isles is somehow groundbreaking, it's nothing particularly new, this information has been available for quite some time, both A Y chromosome census of the British Isles and Y Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration clearly demonstrate that there is a significant non-Anglo-Saxon contribution to the English population. I have also cited the paper Estimating the Impact of Prehistoric Admixture on the Genome of Europeans, which gives similar results to Sykes's book, this has been cited on Welsh people for a very long time indeed. Many scientific papers have been published on this, I have slowly been trying to get a list of relevant papers together, my list is here if you'd like to take a look. All the best. Alun 05:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see. I'd say that the Iberia-Britain link does exist, in the sense of a common genetic background of all Western or Atlantic Europe (including Denmark, btw), of which Basques, Gascons, Bretons and British Celts are the best preserved "living fossils". But LSLM's approach to the subject is quite confuse, assuming many things that are not likely. Even if there was some migration from Iberia to Ireland or Britain in the Megalithic age, what is possible, R1b would not be the marker that would identify it (maybe some of its subclades but there are no such detailed works that I know of) but Mediterranean haplogroups like J or, specially, E3, that are very small in Iberia and much more in Britain.
 * My apportation to the talk pages (not to the articles themselves probably - I already have enough trying to put some order in the articles of Basque theme, let the Welsh write their own history) will be neutral anyhow. I dislike building a history of any people based on interpretations of mythology only. Mythology is interesting and must be mentioned but as such, not giving it credibility by mixing the apples of the legends with the oranges of the archaeological and genetic facts arbitrarily.
 * Thanks for the link to that other paper, that I don't think I have read before. I'll take a deep look at it probably.
 * Enjoy, --Sugaar 07:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * PS, greetings to a fellow anarchist (are you an anarcho-syndicalist?). I recently read Stuart Christie's book Granny Made me an Anarchist. Will be getting Demanding the Impossible: History of Anarchism and Anarchists in the Spanish Civil War: v. 1 soon. Nice to talk to a proper Iberian Anarchist, you guys rock. No pasaran. Alun 13:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm actually more like Autonomous but I'm still affiliated to CNT. Rather than Iberian, I feel Basque, European and Human (in whichever order). I have major grudges with Spaniards and pan-Iberianists - in fact that's one of the reasons why I'm not active in CNT anymore: they totally ignore the national problem in the name of internationalism.
 * Anyhow, forget the myths: one thing was in 1936-37, and another very different is today. Too many people in CNT seem to live in the past. I look to the present and the future. Personally I'm much more inspired by the fights of the 70s and 80s (and even 60s) than by the 30s. We live in a different age: the industrial worker has been replaced by the social worker (for good or bad).
 * And I haven't read any of those books. Have you read anything of Negri? --Sugaar 15:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I get your point, I deliberately avoided saying Spanish, so chose Iberian, it's hard to know how people identify. Personally I feel Welsh and British and European etc, but none of these are political identities. For example I struggle with the idea of Welsh independence because I don't think that a Welsh state would necessarily be any better or worse than a British one, just changing one elite for another. I've been thinking a lot about mutualism recently and am a big fan of collectivism. I haven't read a lot of theory as such, but started to question capitalism via socialism and communism. I regected these as too authoritarian, and read a bit of Chomsky and have read arround Wikipedia regarding Anarchism over the last couple of years or so. I particularly like the article Anarchism and capitalism. Most of what I know I know from Wikipedia though. I haven't read any Negri, but thanks for the tip, I'll get hold of some and have a read. Alun 17:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think a Basque state would be any better in the class-dialectic sense, but I think it will be better for the survival of a milennary culture and that's a point. After all we are not fighting in vaccuum but in social realities and in general the Basque Country is more progressive than Spain. Maybe this can't be extrapolated to Wales, I don't know. In any case, it's a matter of the right to self-determination, a principle that all libertarians (anarchists, autonomous) should support.
 * As I grow older I'm less interested in abstract political or economical theories and more in the reality of self-organization of the people, what is what someone over here called self-determining and self-determinated self-determination, that is self-determination as an active praxis and not a political goal solved in a poll. I think that's something Negri, from his Marxist background, also says: that the masses (the people(s)) will choose their goals and methods, that those will be (are) flexible and acording to their (our) needs, that no elite, either intelectual or political will define that in a meeting room.
 * From non-ideological readings (more like sciences), I also realize that systems (including socio-economical ones) must face a major crisis to perform radical changes.
 * Well, anyhow, that's why I am in Wikipedia: it's something like anarchy at work, with all its limitations but with all its potential. --Sugaar 19:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Disambiguation
I disagree with both of your choices, but I don't care that much, so do as you will. Regards. -- Jeff3000 12:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The BAP debate
What I think the other user may have been meaning by referring you to WP:AGF and WP:NPA is as follows:
 * By claiming that your work was being "sabotaged", you were casting aspersions on what he was doing, which was a personal attack
 * Likewise, you were assuming that he was simply nominating the article for deletion because he felt like it, rather than crediting him with having thought it through

For the record, I'm leaning towards the band being notable anyway. The argument that English-language sources need to be supplied is a nonsense, since something of this nature is going to generate more sources in Basque than English. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I was maybe a little rough about that, but really it felt like sabotage because the article had just been created (what I did to fill in a link from another article, btw). There were no arguments in favor of deletion but just abstract appeals to WP pages without clear reasoning.
 * I do think that the deletion nomination was quite capricious, anyhow. --Sugaar 15:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Your Personal Attack
Your statement "Are you a neonazi troll?" to User:Dark Tichondrias on this edit is considered a personal attack which is against Wikipedia's policy on personal attacks.--Dark Tichondrias 16:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not a statement (affirmation), it's a question. The White people page has been repetaely vanadalized by such people and, considering your argumentation "Stormfront says this, this other minuscule Nazi group says that", I was wondering if it is your case. Can you reply with sincerity? --Sugaar 17:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Bravo!!! - Bizkaia
Hello again Sugaar... all I can say is BRAVO! the Biscay article is by far the best one about any province. I don´t know if this is permitted in here but... ''Nos esta quedando un articulo de puta madre! '' David 16:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Bravo to you, David. I've only made some apportations, you have been very steady. :)
 * Will it be featured in the main page? --Sugaar 16:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Irish
Hi, I restored Icelanders as most of the female settlers were Irish women with some Irish men taken as slaves- see Demographics of Iceland. Regards Arniep 22:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok. Maybe you want to comment on the Talk page about that. It's interestig to know. --Sugaar 00:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Majority of women
Hi, thought I'd ask your opinion about something you are likely to know. The National Assembly for Wales article has a verified statement that it is the first legislature in the world to have majority female representation. There was a by election earlier this year that lead to 29 men and 31 women in the parliament (before it had been 30 to 30). Although the statement is verified from a Welsh newspaper I have often wondered if it is actually correct. Now someone has pointed out that the Basque Parliament article states a 40 to 35 split in favour of women, but this is not verified. I'd like to know if the Basque Parliament elected a majority female legislature before the Welsh Assembly, if so I'd like to include this in the Welsh Assembly article, maybe you could let me know, and also you could more easily find a source to verify it. Thanks for the help. Alun 17:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I knew that this last term it was that way but had forgotten about the details. So I made a quick search and found this (in Spanish). It says that the difference is 38 to 37. This is because the new electoral law obligues all parties to present at least 50% women in their lists, in segments of 6 candidates (Basque and Spanish electoral system is via closed partisan lists and quasi-proportional representation in each circunscription). There was therefore some uncertainty on wether women would be as many as men but the fact that EHAK (the electoral alternative to Batasuna) had its lists full of women (6 out of 9 elects) on top positions made the difference. Anyhow it is not the only Basque party lead by women, at least electorally: EA and PP have women as leaders, Aralar also had a list lead by a woman and, in Navarre, the moderate nationalist bloc is also represented by a former female TV news anchor. Since Ibarretxe is President also, the Vicepresident has been a woman (Idoia Zenazurrabeitia).
 * I don't know if this makes a difference but this first parliament with female majority was elected in March 2005. In any case, the Welsh one should still be the second one in EU and the first one in Northern Europe, I guess. And the difference is anyhow small, anecdotical, I'd say. So I guess I must congratulate Welsh people for being in the avant-guard of gender equality in this aspect. --Sugaar 20:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Encartaciones y Navarra
Usuario Sugaar:

No sé cómo te permites borrar párrafos enteros injustificadamente.

Puede que te moleste la existencia de un movimiento secesionista en Álava, pero debes entender que una web con pretensiones enciclopédicas como Wikipedia no puede obviar su existencia. Es cierto que el partido Unión Alavesa ha sido disuelto, principalmente porque la mayoría de sus votantes han basculado hacia el PSOE y sobre todo hacia el PP: Pero lo cierto es que era un partido que tenía representación parlamentaria hace 4 años y eso debe mencionarse. Si Wikipedia recoge información acerca de Aberri y Acción Nacionalista Vasca, grupos ya desaparecidos, no veo por qué no puede hacer mención de Unión Alavesa.

Por todo ello he decidido restaurar la información relativa a dicho partido. Si quieres, lo que puedes hacer es mencionar el hecho de que este partido ya no tiene representación parlamentaria.

Me gustaría saber dónde has leído eso de que en Encartaciones se ha hablado euskara de toda la vida. ¿Dónde están esos estudios toponímicos que citas? Los que he leído muestran que en las Encartaciones Occidentales no hay un sólo topónimo que sea de origen euskérico. Lo cierto es que esta región fue regalada por el Rey de Castilla al Señor de Vizcaya en 1285 como pago de su ayuda en la Guerra del Estrecho. Se trata de una región de cultura cántabra que fue unida artificialmente a Vizcaya y al País Vasco, y conservó hasta 1833 sus instituciones propias en el seno de Vizcaya.

Por todo lo dicho, te recomiendo que no borres información posteada por otros usuarios. Expresa tu opinión, pero sin eliminar lo escrito por mí y por otros wikipedistas. En caso contrario me veré obligado a revertir tus cambios.

saludos,

80.35.54.46 21:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

PD: Por cierto, puedes escribir la respuesta en mi página de discusión.


 * You are not logged in. You are just an IP, anyhow. I will only discuss in English. Try not to contaminate my talk page with Spanish. This is the English Wikipedia.
 * I deleted those paragraphs with a comment in the corresponding discussion page. It has a reason: you assumed gratuitously that Arabans and Navarrese are "minorities", like Roma, Spaniards or Galicians maybe. Nobody considers them that way.
 * Enkarterriak has loads of Basque topinymics and surnames. I never claimed what you say: only that it's likely that Basque was spoken there. Where we do have documentation is for Upper La Rioja, where Basque was spoken in the Early Middle Ages. Both areas belonged to the same Autrigon tribe in Roman times.
 * As you seem to know so much history, you'd probably know that all "Castile" up to Burgos itself was Navarre once and toponimy is aboundant in Basque names (like the river Urbel: black waters, just to mention a single example).
 * In any case you should discuss this in the corresponding discussion page. It's not a personal matter but a question of accuracy and how the article is best. This is not a board for political propaganda. --Sugaar 21:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Marsiliano and article Machismo
First of all I'm not a vandal, I don't belong to the tribe that overran Spain in the 5th century. Secondly you were unjustifiably aggressive when I first began editing the machismo article, I believe you called me an anti-Latino "Hisspanist" or something to that effect. Clearly you meant to hurt my feelings by hissing "hispanist" at me and you meant to undermine my editorial work and credibility. The truth is that the article was in a state of disrepair and had long been suffering from editorial neglect. I'm not a perfect editor and I don't have all the time I would like to dedicate to the article, but it is an incontrovertible fact that I have dedicated a significant and laudable amount of research and writing to the piece and that although the article does incorporate points of view, those povs are never my own, but rather reflect the outlook of writers and intellectuals who have fundamentally contributed to the discourse on machismo. I am completely fluent in Spanish and English and this allows me to not only research, edit and write in both languages, but also to provide extremely accurate translations of some of the most "canonical" definitions and explications of machismo. It seems you have some very strong feelings with regards to this topic, passion is good but only up to a point, then it becomes fanaticism. I urge you to desist in your persecution of me and my editorial work, I'm willing to listen to what you have to say, but I will not be bullied or cowed by your unjust and biased attempts at censoring my contributions. Needless to say, you are welcome to positively and actively contribute to the article yourself, but if you do so please respect the work of others. Everything that was in place before my edits was, in one way or another, absorbed and incorporated into my changes--I hope you take care to do the same.--4.245.182.77 21:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * If you'r so great (or macho would be the best word maybe) why are you hiding behind an IP adress? Oh and how can you describe your own work as laudable, surely only other people can do that? Alun 23:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I am not bullying you. Nor I am editing your comments nor your talkpage. I have tried to diealogue with you and you have shunned all my attempts, eventually truning very aggressive, specially when you wrote in Spanish.
 * I tried to get you to understand that other's work in that article (that you deleted) was also valuable, that you were going maybe too far in your hyper-erudite (pedantic?) disgression on the Spanish lexicology of the the expression and that you have a POV that seems to restrict the English concept of machismo (and even the Spanish one) to an ethnic meaning, that it definitely doesn't have in either language.
 * I acknowldege that you have dedicated a good deal of work to YOUR POV edition of the article. But as it's not just "your" article but Wikipedia's, you should better accept the need of wikifying it, including keeping the generalistic introduction that you arbitrarily deleted, keeping a non-POV approach to the meaning of the term, and probably limiting the scope of your lexicological study to a more limited extent.
 * You just snubbed my atempts of discussion and, when you became really aggressive, I decided to revert for the good of Wikipedia and that particular article. --Sugaar 00:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Alun: he's User:Marsiliano. I think he systematically forgets to log in. --Sugaar 00:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Si lo que quieres es que te den atención, sugiero que busques otro método, el actual me parece un poco infantil, o más bien imbecil.--4.245.245.96 05:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Translation of the above: If what you want is to be given attention, I suggest that you seek another method, the current one seems to me a little childish, or rather imbecil.
 * Reply: does not deserve any reply. --Sugaar 07:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I will be more pro-active in this matter than Durova. I have semi-protected the relevant articles. Please fix them up. —Centrx→talk &bull; 17:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Centrx. Guess it will help. --Sugaar 09:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Hombre, sabía que tu madre era una va(s)ca pero no por eso pensé que serías tan gilipollas.

P.S. Dile que cierre sus piernas de vez en cuando que se le van a meter las moscas, capullo.--Marsiliano 03:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Translation (for the record): Man, I knew your mother was a cow(Basque) but I did not think that you'd be such an asshole for that reason.
 * P.S. Tell her that close her legs now and then, that flies are going to get inside, jerk.
 * Reply: in these occasions is when one best understands Zinedine Zidane. En fin. --Sugaar 09:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Marsiliano
I've removed the most recent insult (no translation needed, thanks) and extended the editor's block to one month. If you wish, leave a note at my user talk page and I'll semi-protect your talk page. Thank you for your patience.  Durova  00:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL - you didn't even left me time to read it (I had to use the history). Thanks a lot. If there are more aggressions, I will notify you. --Sugaar 05:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Centrx expanded the block to indefinite. As a side note, I sort of wonder whether this was an example of machismo (by his definition) since he didn't respect blocks from a woman.  Shrug.  I hope Wikipedia becomes a much less stressful place for you now.  You handled this admirably well.  Durova  18:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't know. We could digress for a while about that. What's exactly machista or just authoritarian... you know. I do think he's machista for several reasons, starting but what I percieved as an apology of machismo (as a suppossedly ethnic Hispanic trait) in his "erudite" edits and because his continuous usage of machista insults. Anyhow, he didn't seem ready to accept any kind of compromise nor authority: he doesn't seem to understand how this works. Just took the page and edited as if it was his own blog. When I protested, he first ignored and then attacked personally, trying to bring the conflict of POVs to a personal confrontation.
 * En fin. Guess I'm beleaguered(?) in assambleary work, and know that this kind of personal attacks only mean lack of justification, lack of reasons. That they actually are negative for the position of the one who uses them, because he/she disqualifies him/herself.
 * Thanks to you both. I guess it was a difficult case because it's not the typical vandalism, at least not intially, but rather falls in the cathegory of "complex vandalism". You did a good job too.
 * Enjoy,
 * --Sugaar 18:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)