User talk:SugarBrother

Notice
See also this page.  SPECIFICO talk 15:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Please see this page WP:COI and see whether you have any relationships that should be disclosed.  SPECIFICO talk 02:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
You need to get consensus on talk for content that's been reverted. Moreover, the New York Post is a tabloid that is not a valid source for controversial content involving living people. If there is valid content to be added, you should easily be able to find several mainstream reliable sources from which article content can be drawn. If you find such sourcing, please present a proposal on the talk page.  SPECIFICO talk 00:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

I looked up the definition of edit warring. That is not what has been occurring. Please do not use deceptive titles for your concerns. Furthermore, why is the New York Post not considered a valid source? That's a slippery slope to begin determining what makes a source valid or not. I've seen plenty of sources used on wikipedia that are far less "valid" than the NY Post. -SugarBrother