User talk:Sugar bliss cookie

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Sugar bliss cookie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. INeverCry  20:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (The contents mainly provides information about cookie jar company which will help people to understand about this sort of companies; what this sort of company offer to customer. Besides, this will helps to academics, researchers and other professionals to find information about such company in Canada like this (i.e. why they are famous for, what strategy they are following on marketing point of view and so on.

Thus, in conclusion, contents are surely informative not promotional.

Regards) --202.4.173.61 (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)