User talk:Sugarsugar123

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy on attribution and verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do you have any sources that "Rebbeca Langron" is actually going to appear in the second season? Squirepants101 19:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Squirepants101 20:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content is considered vandalism and may result in a block. Squirepants101 21:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Do not attempt to add hoaxes on Wikipedia. Squirepants101 22:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.--Wafulz 04:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Leg Up
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Leg Up, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Too Cool for School
Hello, Sugarsugar123,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Too Cool for School should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Too Cool for School.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 04:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)