User talk:Suhayli

Qadiani Problem
Please discuss beforehand on talk pages. Peaceworld111 (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Why are you not content with neutral article, expressing views of both sides. Why are you making it one-sided?Suhayli (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I have not removed anything. I have only added and reorganised. From the text added, which do you think is not neutral and why? Peaceworld111 (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * With regards to Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, you started to talk about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, which is a different article. This is the reason why I reverted. Also if it is with regards to criticism of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, I would advise you to summarise it in his article in a sentence, and not put a whole chunk of mainstream views in the introduction section. With regards to detail of mainstream view, that has already been dealt with in the Criticism section, unless you have something different to add. Thank You. Peaceworld111 (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

What you are doing is nothing but vendalism. You have no right to use Wikipedia to express your personal belief system. Articles must be neutral. You are constantly making them biased, expressing views of one community. What you are adding is view of only Ahmadia, not comprehensive view.Suhayli (talk) 04:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I repeat which sentence or sentences are not neutral?Peaceworld111 (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy and discuss viewpoints thoroughly before making any changes if you disagree about a certain point. Peaceworld111 (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

It is strange that you are damaging neutrality of article and are blaming me. Suhayli (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I demanded you to explain many times, but you ignored.Peaceworld111 (talk) 17:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Mehdiviyyat nay Islam ko Kia Diya?
You have mentioned subject book on given user_talk page for Cunado. Where did you get the book or how can I see it???

[of Sub-Article of Mahdi]

Thanks for response in advance.

Azgs (talk) 09:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Meem Hasan Latifi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meem Hasan Latifi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meem Hasan Latifi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bhaur Rajputs


The article Bhaur Rajputs has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability, no substantial sources found."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)