User talk:Sujinkim1223

The Millennium Project
Please STOP adding promotional/unencyclopedic material to this article. You have now been reverted by 2 different editors. Please also have a look at WP:3RR. The next time you revert, you may be blocked from editing. --Randykitty (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, Randykitty! I appreciate you notice on my violation. I can acknowledge some part of my edition were promotional but don't think all of things were, so I'd like to edit again without any kind of promotional things. I don't want to make the same mistake again as you warned me, hence, could you please let me know which parts of my previous edition you thought were promotional or unencyclopedic? -Sujinkim1223 (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Most of them, I fear. What do you expect to read when you read an encyclopedia? Something that resembles the organizations website or a serious discussion of the organization by others? Find independent sources that say something about this group, so that we can establish notability, that is much more important than adding multiple links (masquerading as "references") to their homepage, including promotional blabla (mission statements and such), lists of members of obscure committees (almost never suitable for inclusion per WP:NOTADIRECTORY), all kinds of other uninformative lists, etc. --Randykitty (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 15 Global Challenges


A tag has been placed on 15 Global Challenges requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.millennium-project.org/millennium/challeng.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, Largoplazo! Thank you for letting me know about the copyright infringement regulation of Wikipedia. I read your comment, and then, actually I'd just like to let you know I'm working at The Millennium Project which is carrying out "15 Global Challenges". Jerome Glenn, CEO of The Millennium Project, confirmed me to upload the information about 15 Global Challenges from the website of The Millennium Project(www.millennium-project.org). I wonder what I should do to create the page of 15 Global Challenges in this case. -Sujinkim1223 (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The best advice probably is: don't. The Millenium Project is itself already of doubtful notability (note that this has nothing to do with "deserving" or "worthy"), their 15GC are almost certainly not notable. In any case, just stating that someone gave you permission to post something that is subjected to copyright is not sufficient here, as there is no way of checking that you actually are who you are (I am not implying that you're not being truthful, but this is a legal matter and WP cannot risk violating someone's copyright). There is a mechanism in place to release material into the public domain, see here. Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)