User talk:Sujithpuliyanam

A tag has been placed on Kadahakali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andreworkney (talk) 12:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Desasevini grammena vayanasala
Desasevini Grameena Vayanasala, is a grade A library in Ernakulam District. It was established more than 50 years ago and serves as a most important information store and cultural central of Puliyanam. Vayanasa completed its diamond jubilee. Pro.K Sachidanadan inagurated it libraries jubilee celebration. Dr. M Leelavathi & N K Desam were presented its inagural function. V T memorial speech was conducted here at November 4.Kerala's first local libray which has its own libray management software bult by committee 2003-2007. This library has a collection of more than 10,000 books in various subjects.

The organizing committee of library is based on 11 people of executive members. The committee members of 2007-2008 are 1.V Vinod Kumar (secretary) 2.E S Narayanam (President) 3.M P kuriakose 4.E R Balakrishnan 5.E A Gopinadahan Nair 6.K R Baburaj 7.E R Indira 8.M P Parameswaran 9.K R Udayavarma 10.P A Balakrishnam 11.S Sujith

This article needs more information: How is it funded, how any books does it buy a year, does it lend to borrowers, what is the number os users, the number of books cirulated. is it open to the public, how any staff are there and with what qualificiations? The committee names don't matter to an encyclpedia,, but the name of the head  libarian does, preferably all of them in sequence with the years of their positions. where did' s(he) get his or her training. And especially are there any 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases) that talk about it. Any language, but if not english ,give a translation. See our guide to writing Wikipedia articles for further ideas about content. DGG (talk) 07:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with Image:Dd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dd.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the image under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Desasevini.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Desasevini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nepatya for koodiyattam
A tag has been placed on Nepatya for koodiyattam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 10:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)