User talk:Sukai Cerny

Upgrow
I see you're a new editor and that your eleventh edit (when you became wp:autoconfirmed) is the creation of a new article, Upgrow. This is a reminder that if you have a conflict of interest with the subject of that article, you may be required to disclose that per the terms of use of wikimedia. See Terms of Use. Vexations (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Upgrow
Hello Sukai Cerny,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Upgrow for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Time series database. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 21:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Icon Savings Plan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Icon Savings Plan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Icon Savings Plan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 04:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm ElKevbo. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 18:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Connection to Maryland University of Integrative Health?
Do you have a connection to Maryland University of Integrative Health? ElKevbo (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes I do. Sukai Cerny (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You must comply with our policy about paid editing. Do not edit again until you have read and abided by it. ElKevbo (talk) 21:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Final warning about paid editing
Hello Sukai Cerny. You have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sukai Cerny. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Do not edit further until you answer this message. ElKevbo (talk) 21:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)