User talk:Sukant9993

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukant Kadam (April 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukant Kadam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sukant Kadam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sukant_Kadam Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sukant_Kadam reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 11:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sukant Kadam


The article Sukant Kadam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Three of the four references are by the subject himself. The other is just a database entry at the BWF, showing activity in 2016 and 2017. I'm not familiar with what constitutes the 'highest levels' per WP:NBAD, but general notability is certainly not demonstrated. I suggest draftifying and notifying the (autobiography) editor about notability requirements."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —[ Alan M 1  (talk) ]— 13:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 12:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sukant Kadam


A tag has been placed on Sukant Kadam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sukant Kadam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC) Re:Dl2000Hi, Thank you. I will not remove it.Sukant Kadam (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Sukant9993

Hello, Sukant9993, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Conflict of interest editing
Hello, Sukant9993. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sukant Kadam, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 10:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello, Melcous. I really didn't get what you said. will you please help me out to avoid conflict of interest.

Gaurav Khanna
Gaurav Khanna is an Indian para-badminton head coach from Lucknow. A former national badminton player and the current coach of the Indian Para-badminton team who brings the para-sport scene, passion and dedication to India, and is behind the rise of champion para-athletes. He has dedicated his life to train the physically and intellectually challenged athletes to achieve their dreams on the badminton court.

Awards
2016 he received the Yash Bharti Award. Gaurav Khanna is the recipient of the most prestigious award instituted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh – the Yash Bharti Award, which was conferred upon him in 2016 for his contribution towards promoting badminton for the physically challenged.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav Khanna (badminton) (May 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaurav Khanna (badminton) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gaurav Khanna (badminton), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gaurav_Khanna_(badminton) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gaurav_Khanna_(badminton) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You did not get a response to this question. Google searches do not generally index new articles on Wikipedia right away. By the time you read this (since I am way behind reading the archives), perhaps this will be done by then. To quote a response to a similar question by : It will not be indexed by search engines for 90 days or until it has been reviewed, whichever is the shorter period.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, this is weird. Eagleash was responding to you.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  22:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Nagar Krishna moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nagar Krishna, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EditQwerty (talk) 11:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Krishna Nagar
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Krishna Nagar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I have reverted your hijack of a disambiguation page at Krishna Nagar. If you wish to create a new article then you should use the AfC process (as I see you have done from your Talk page above) and not take over another valid page: this is actively harmful. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Further warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Krishna Nagar, you may be blocked from editing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Explanation of Krishna Nagar
As the page I created is about Krishna Nagar Indian Para Badminton Player who is currently world number 2 in para-badminton. I request you to keep the athlete and place in different page. It is just coincidence that there names are same. He has won medal in last year BWF Para-Badminton World Championships 2019 BWF Para-Badminton World Championships also won 2 medals for India. Sukant Kadam (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Sukant9993
 * No. If you want to create an article then choose a different title: perhaps Krishna Nagar (basketball). You have now blanked and overwritten Krishna Nagar three times: do not do it again. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nagar Krishna


Hello, Sukant9993. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nagar Krishna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Krishna Nagar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Krishna Nagar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Krishna Nagar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Krishna Nagar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Zoglophie. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pramod Bhagat without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  zoglophie  08:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pramod Bhagat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  zoglophie  08:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Pramod Bhagat, you may be blocked from editing.  zoglophie  08:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Zoglophie Requesting you to stop editing Pramod Bhagat. The information you are continuously changing is wrong and you are spreading wrong information.

Your recent editing history at Pramod Bhagat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. David Biddulph (talk) 08:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--RegentsPark (comment) 13:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

COI
You posted passport of Pramod Bhagat. See WP:COI and tell if you have conflict of interest with Pramod Bhagat. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I see that you have declared your COI with the person. You are not allowed to edit the page directly and you should use talk page instead if you want to any edits made there. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)


 * There is No COI with Pramod Bhagat And This is request for you to stop changing the information as that is wrong information. You are creating lots of problem for Pramod Bhagat by changing the birth place again and again. Stop doing this. Abhishek0831996
 * You are welcome to defend your case of COI at WP:COIN. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continual disruption by a user who refuses to heed warnings or obey policies. Thank you. Kerberous (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Pramod Bhagat) for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jauerback I have edited the information which is real. For your information people are started spreading wrong information about Pramod Bhagat as you can see on his passport the birth place of Pramod Bhagat is Attabira Odisha but few people have changed this information and spread wrong information about his birth place. He is Gold medalist from Paralympic Games and facing lot of problems due to this. IF you want I can provide you more details about his birth place. Sukant Kadam (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You were edit warring and instead of trying to reach a consensus on the talk page, you kept reverting to your preferred version. Also, it's quite obvious that you can't maintain a neutral point of view when editing that page and you have a clear conflict of interest as shown here, so I would suggest you find another article that interests you. Finally, please see WP:BLPPRIMARY about providing information (such as a copy of his passport). In short, stop doing that. If you can convince another admin to unblock you from editing Pramod Bhagat, feel free to try, but I won't. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Kumar Nitesh moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kumar Nitesh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kumar Nitesh (January 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumar Nitesh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kumar_Nitesh Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kumar_Nitesh reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kumar Nitesh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kumar Nitesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kumar Nitesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  // Timothy :: talk  01:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @TimothyBlue Nitesh Kumar is an indian athlete and currently world number 3 in Para-badminton. https://bwfbadminton.com/player/P70490/kumar-nitesh/ Sukant Kadam (talk) 13:26, 21 January 2023 (UTC)