User talk:Sukh17

Home team orientation for Template:NHLPlayoffs
I left a message on Template talk:NHLPlayoffs regarding the location of the home and away teams. Since you've done the most work on the template, you might be the best person to do the maintenance on this. Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll look into making an adjustment to the template sometime in the next couple of months as I am currently preoccupied with other projects outside of Wikipedia. In any case, due to the large adoption of this template on several different articles the changes that must be made so that all those articles are not disturbed. The change I am contemplating will implement a new parameter that will allow for the switching of the position of the home and away teams. Following the change, users will have to manually insert the parameters into each instance of the template that they wish to change the position of the home and away teams (as well as make any changes in the appearance of the hidden statistics section. Once all articles have been verified to include the parameter (whether they are sticking to the original positions or the new positions), then the default position can then be set to away vs. home. Keep in mind that this is a quite expansive, difficult and time-consuming change to implement effectively without disturbing many articles. &mdash;Sukh17 Talk 20:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Leitch Elementary School


The article James Leitch Elementary School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable elementary school, fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Gomes Elementary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gomes Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gomes Elementary School(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Chadbourne Elementary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chadbourne Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chadbourne Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mission Valley Elementary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mission Valley Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mission Valley Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Parkmont Elementary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parkmont Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Parkmont Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

File:American High School, Fremont, California (approximate model).gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American High School, Fremont, California (approximate model).gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Floor plann (American High School, Fremont, California).jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Floor plann (American High School, Fremont, California).jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like Sukh17's original work of 2007 was copied and uploaded to Commons herea few months after his last activity in 2012. The Commons image is used to good effect in the American High School (Fremont, California) article. --Hjal (talk) 00:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NHLBracket/2
Template:NHLBracket/2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:NBAbox
I wonder if you'll ever continue work on the template, which I had recently discovered and left a topic on WikiProject NBA? I would want to know so we may finally consider it. –Piranha249 (talk) 23:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Coordinators and help needed
Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you. Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ice Hockey Game
Template:Ice Hockey Game has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)