User talk:Sulaiman.lodhi3

February 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rustam, Mardan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:49, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mardan District into Rustam, Mardan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Sulaiman.lodhi3, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Pakistan
 Welcome!

We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:


 * You can give your input on issues at the project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
 * You can add the project's to do list to your watchlist and help in what interests you.
 * You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan-related article on Wikipedia.
 * Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
 * Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
 * Add your name in the members' list at WikiProject Pakistan members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: User WikiProject Pakistan
 * You may also like to add your name to List of Pakistani Wikipedians by number of edits.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

March 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sudhum Rustam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sudhum Rustam. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Please note that social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd, blog and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

''  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) reliable source - see WP:RS
 * 2) primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
 * 3) verification - see WP:V
 * 4) notability - see WP:N
 * 5) webcite - see  WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sudhum Rustam. ''Facebook is not a reliable source. - pls see independent reliable source - WP:RS''  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Sudhum Rustam
I am an educated resident of Sudhum Rustam. I am aware of what are the policies of wikipedia. I have pulled the data from well reputed websites, books and personal visits to the places which I have mentioned. The article Sudhum Rustam was in very poor condition when I started contributions to this article. I am going to reference it. I have already started referring it. But suppose you have not checked it. Let me familiarize people with my area. Please let me finish what I started. Regards


 * Hi Sulaiman.lodhi3, Thank you for message above which I pasted it here from the email you sent me.  Pls note content added/edited needs to accompany by inline citation and it is the WP:BURDEN on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records  are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd, blog and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing.  Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Content added has no source or with social media site as source will be removed. Pls see


 * reliable source - see WP:RS
 * primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
 * verification - see WP:V
 * notability - see WP:N
 * webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web


 * For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk</b>) 18:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of InfoSkye


A tag has been placed on InfoSkye, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Velella  Velella Talk 00:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate.

I note that the source I identified does not appear to be the original source let's discuss if the source of your material is actually a properly licensed reference. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)