User talk:Suleimanbk

March 2016
Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bakori without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Weegeerunner chat it up 16:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

September 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammadu Buhari, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --Bamyers99 (talk) 22:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Muhammadu Buhari, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ammarpad (talk) 22:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

January 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bakori, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Arjayay, which part or parts of the edit is controversial or likely to be challenged, as per reliable source? Any that fell outside of this could of been addressed with "Fact" template etc. or removed, this inexperienced contributor did quite a lot of work on this and 90% looked good to me even if un-sourced and your blanket removal adds nothing.121.99.108.78 (talk) 18:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * There are far too many unsourced additions to cover with templates - Arjayay (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Bakori. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Arjayay, agree, as per above though "which part or parts of the edit is controversial or likely to be challenged", lets assume good faith and allow that this appears to be the users specialist subject, so deleting because you do not have the time to review all is bad practice and wasting time and effort, lets tag the somewhat dubious, give time to adjust and add references where needed and remove obvious controversial additions (or copy and paste, which the latest, since my comments, looks a little bit like?), however, to warn and remove without review, could easily discourage any further potentially useful addition from this user and again, adds nothing to this article or the encyclopaedia itself.19:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)121.99.108.78 (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)