User talk:Sulloa09

May 2016
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Clubjustin (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

DCU Animated Movie edits
I get that you are new to this, but edit-warring in what you think is obvious is not the right way to go about it. We use discussion pages, and I have done so to explain why that material cannot go into the article without reliably-sourced references that explicitly state that such and such movie comprise such and such comic book story arcs. Without them, it will not be able to go in. If you have an alternate reasoning, the article talk page is where you need to go, as your edit summaries are not swaying me. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I am confused as to your edit summary. I haven't reported you to AN:3R, although I certainly could; you probably shouldn't consider WP:3R to be an electric fence (ie, 3 reverts and you are reported). In actuality, you can be blocked if you show behavior consistent with edit-warring. I have twice now asked you to come to the talk page and discuss why you think the material should remain in the article; you keep reverting instead of discussing. I think that you should reconsider this; I want to hear your viewpoint, but you are concreting my resolve regarding the matter when you simply revert and insult me. Someone else has undone your revert. Please use this as an indication that you are likely to get a lot further with discussion than with edit summaries. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)