User talk:Suman Kumar Mallick

Nomination of Suman Kumar Mallick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suman Kumar Mallick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suman Kumar Mallick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Suman Kumar Mallick, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Suman Kumar Mallick/sandbox


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Suman Kumar Mallick/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 22:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Request for unblocking my wiki account

 * Further, do not create additional accounts for any purpose—including to petition for an unblock, as you did with —C.Fred (talk) 04:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * User has continued to engage in block evasion, as . --Yamla (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * And . --Yamla (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * And . Block evasion is happening frequently enough that I won't continue to report it here. --Yamla (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Suman, you need to STOP MAKING NEW ACCOUNTS. Every time you do this it only makes it worse for you. If you were to make a request where you 1) promise not to make any more new accounts, and 2) promise not to remove the "proposed deletion" and "conflict of interest" tags from the article, only to improve it - it might be considered. People are looking to see if you understand what you did wrong: creating false accounts, and removing tags from the page. The fact that you are breaking the rules to make these requests only makes it more likely that your request will be refused. --MelanieN (talk) 18:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * P.S. Even though your main account, User:Suman Kumar Mallick, is blocked, I think you can still edit this page. Try it! --MelanieN (talk) 18:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll add that, in order to get unblocked, you should also either provide proof of identity via WP:OTRS, or request a change of username via Special:GlobalRenameRequest. Your username is the name of a well-known living person, and I'm sure you'll understand that we should make sure that the person using that name indeed is that well-known person and not some impostor. See WP:IMPERSONATE for details. Huon (talk) 18:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

This user is now taking the approach that this account has been hacked. See User talk:Junior Kumar Mallick. Although obviously untrue, WP:COMPROMISED may now apply. --Yamla (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Request for unblock
That may be true, but you knew about WP:NPA and continued making legal threats. You knew about WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK and continued setting up accounts to get around your block. You knew about WP:COPYRIGHT and continued to violate copyright. And you knew about WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO and continued violating them. And that's not considering the several cases where you outright lied. Your unblock request will have to be substantially more convincing than this. You've been one of the most abusive editors around in the weeks you've had your account and still haven't addressed this abuse, nor even remotely attempted to convince us your future edits would be clear of the multiple violations you've committed so far. Most other unblock request I have seen from you state you plan to continue violating WP:COI, for example. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Sir,I didn't know about any of the offence that you have stated but now I have understood all of them including - [WP:NPA], [WP:BLOCK],[WP:SOCK],[WP:COPYRIGHT],[WP:COI],[WP:PAID], and [WP:PROMO] and I will not repeat any of these violence again. Please unblock my account. Suman Kumar Mallick (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * This is just not true. You did know about those policies while you were violating them, because we told you about them over and over again. I'll also note that all of your contributions have been in violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID. Now that you claim you understand this, how would your future edits differ from your past edits? What sort of articles would you edit if we unblocked you? What sort of articles would you stay away from, now that you claim to understand these policies? And, just as importantly, when was the last time you engaged in WP:BLOCK evasion? --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Sir,Now I will not make multiple accounts and I will not spread vandalism on any wiki page. I will just make my own biopage on wikipedia because I am a senior political figure in India. Suman Kumar Mallick (talk) 03:54, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No you won't. Because we aren't going to unblock you to continue your violations of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. That would be totally inappropriate and shows you were not telling the truth when you said you would stop violating WP:COI. You will not be unblocked to write about yourself, as we've told you over and over and over again. --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Request for some help
Sir, I want to ask you that how can I be unblocked again. Sir I was blocked by a mistake about which I didn't know. Can you please tell me that how can I be unblocked again. Suman Kumar Mallick (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Stop claiming you didn't know. You did know. We told you over and over and over again. Heck, you've continued to engage in violations of WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK this month. You will not be unblocked until you demonstrate you understand why your edits were inappropriate, demonstrate a clear understanding of WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, WP:AUTOBIO, WP:SOCK, and WP:BLOCK, all of which you continue to violate. You will need to agree to refrain from writing about yourself or about your political party. You'll need to explain what sorts of edits you'll make instead. Please note that I'm tempted at this point to revoke talk page access here. I can't tell if this is a problem with WP:IDHT or with WP:CIR but either way, please consider that you get only one more chance to make an unblock request that shows you have read and understood all of those policies, and addresses all of the concerns I have raised here. One more chance. And for crying out loud, stop claiming this was a mistake or that you didn't know about our policies. You did. Own up to it. --Yamla (talk) 16:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Request for unblock
As you have refused to "explain what sorts of edits you'll make instead", I have revoked your talk page access. However, it's possible your unblock request may be sufficiently convincing for an admin to decide to lift your block. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Nicely verbose unblock appeal. However, this was not a simple mistake. It is part of an ongoing, continual, unrelenting disruption of Wikipedia via abuse of multiple accounts and recreation of articles about the same subject (you) under a variety of titles. You have been told this many, many times. Above you write, "I want to add further informations about me and add some more references and inline citation.I deserve to have Wikiepedia article}" (sic). Wikipedia articles are not a reward; no one deserves one. Your insistence (obsession?) on having one is disruptive, non-constructive, and WP:nothere behavior. Please find some other venue on which to write about yourself.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC) Oh, for the love of, well, me. How many times can you claim, "Sir,When you put a block on me, I didn't know anything about Wikipedia's terms and conditions but now I have completely understood it.Sir now I know that I must not make multiple accounts,so please unblock my account"? Really?--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 10:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

I have now blocked them from sending email. This has wasted enough of everybody's time. --MelanieN (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ban evasion
This user has engaged in ban evasion as of August, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 18:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

User has threatened to continue setting up sockpuppet accounts to evade their block. Not the first time they've threatened this, and the user tends to follow through on these threats. --Yamla (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

This user has engaged in ban evasion and posted targeted sexually explicit content in an attempt to harass me, in September 2018 as. --Yamla (talk) 20:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

This user has issued a legal threat in an attempt to stop people reverting his additions. See User talk:27.72.50.126. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

This user has engaged in ban evasion as of December 2018. --Yamla (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

This user has engaged in ban evasion and legal threats as of January, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Further ban evasion in May, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Suman Kumar Mallick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suman Kumar Mallick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suman Kumar Mallick& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Misterrrrr (talk) 05:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)