User talk:Sumanisonnow

March 2015
Hello, I'm Melcous. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Suman Sridhar because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 12:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Velella. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Suman Sridhar seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 17:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Sumanisonnow, you are invited to the Co-op!
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Suman Sridhar has been reverted. Your edit here to Suman Sridhar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLEChD_MZnY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Sumanisonnow (talk) 18:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Why is my content being deleted despite giving direct quotes and references. How is the information "promotional" if it is sourced from direct references?
 * Mainly because what you have written is not derived from the sources quoted. The Mumbai Boss ref does not say "She has received equal critical and commercial acclaim earning her the reputation of a “vocal gymnast” traversing effortlessly between cultures, genres, languages and sounds. " - and the the reference source itself is not very reliable or robust. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not a Bollywood film review site. Peacock phrasing and personal opinions have no place here. Hence the reason for the several rejections of your edits.  Velella  Velella Talk 21:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, Sumanisonnow. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * As explained above, two years ago, your edits are promotional and it needs to stop; if it doesn't, I will block you. Sorry, but this has gone on for long enough. Drmies (talk) 15:56, 28 August 2017 (UTC)