User talk:Summations

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Basmala
This has been discussed at Talk:Basmala - if you still think you are correct, you will have to bring forwards new arguments and get agreement to change the article's title before you can change the spelling within the article. Dougweller (talk) 10:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 07:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

why??
why my edit not accepted and be reverted again and again?? while i hv mention fully 100% authentic links???? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_Ilyas_Qadri&action=history Ramiz


 * Hello Summations,


 * The article you are trying to edit has a security lock known as: WP:WHITELOCK. This lock prevents unregistered users or registered users who do not have enough editing experience to officially display their edits without approval from longer registered users. The lock is usually placed for preventing vandalism from occurring in the future. Only Administrators can place locks on the articles. You must wait until a user with approval capabilities to review your changes. If disapproved, your edits are reverted to the previous version of the article and is archived in the article's edit history. That's why your edits show reverted because the user or users who have reveiwed your changes do not find your edits valid. If you wish to know why your edits were reverted, Go to that user's "Talk Page" who reverted your changes and discuss it. — ♣Jerm♣  729 10:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your reply at last finally some one replied.... I have already sent msg to that guy who reverted my edit but he did not responding `!!! don't know why...? i have also ask question in help desk too but there also no one replying also i have sent email to wiki... so plz tell me why my sources considered unreliable ? I have mention some very famous scholars views about Ilyas Qadri but they are saying same as I written, mentioned video links , I know video links youtube dailymotion not take reliable but what if the very poplars famous scholars saying in videos same as I written? Also I have mention two books too, one in in english language second one in urdu. plz and
 * Youtube is not considered a valid source. Also, Wikipedia articles are not permitted to have statements, biased opinions or opinions in general by users such as your opinion: "great Sunni Muslim". I highly recommend you wait until one of your reviewers responds to your question or questions. — ♣Jerm♣  729 11:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

why youtube is not consider valid source for this ?, I mean I have written that scholars have very good positive views about Ilyas Qadari they think that he is great personality etc... u can watch video thay that schoars which I written saying in video then why that link will not consider valid? I totally could not understand :( ... and those scholars are accepted great by Sunni Muslims that is why I written that... and if this is not fit for wiki then revertor can edit this word "great"... and secondly if that link still not be accepted then waht about books....? I am 100% that is biased I am not...
 * View Talk:Muhammad Ilyas Qadri for more answers. — ♣Jerm♣  729 19:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi ,

Thank you very much for your assistant, you are the man ! :-) --Summations (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Internet.org
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the Internet.org article, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. You may find our linking guidelines helpful in this regard. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Internet.org— has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I have added a site on "Available websites" section in Internet.org that has been undone, saying "it appeared to be promotional". It was not promotional but truly edited because this site is on freebasics. I added "hahahafunnyjokes" (with its link http://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com). anyone please add this again or let me know why it can't be added? Summations (talk) 04:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Why my Editing undone on Internet.org?
I have added a site on "Available websites" section in Internet.org that has been undone, saying "it appeared to be promotional". It was not promotional but truly edited because this site is on freebasics. I added "hahahafunnyjokes" (with its link http://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com). anyone please add this again or let me know why it can't be added?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Helper202 (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC) - Hi, I have added that site (https://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com) in the "Available websites" section... It was surprising for me that you have removed the site just because you don't like it!? WHY? FreeBasic service allowed this site and it should be in the section of the Available website... what's wrong with it? Please add this site again or give me a logical reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.org#Available_websites [SAME THING ASKED ON jUSDAFAX TALK PAGE]
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Internet.org. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Helper202 (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)