User talk:Summer Song

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dmn / &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; 23:57, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

About Jehovah's Witnesses
I can't understand what you said in this. You said: This non-acceptance is mutual; quite a number of non-Jehovah's Witness Christians believe that it is the Jehovah's Witnesses who have departed from the truth. Then what is the truth that you say? Trinity? Christian cross? Or others? Please explain. And if you think your belief is truth, I think you should prove from the Bible. Rantaro 07:58, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

All religious people have departed from the truth.

Franz
Hi SS, just wanted to let you know that br franz did maintain that only anointed bros coulsd serve on the GB and after his death this changed. I did not feel it an impotant point to add, but at least you know the truth. george 22:37, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Reordering pages
Summer Song, please discuss page changes prior to actually implementing them. Thanks. Netkinetic 20:07, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses
I invite you to sign in as a participant to the new WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses project and add that page to your watchlist. Tom Haws 21:04, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

Creating Articles w/ Categories
Good work creating new articles. When you create things, it helps tremendously to assign them to an accurate category (see WP:CG for info). If you're really not sure about categories, at least assign your new articles a stub category (see WP:SC for info). By assigning a category, you help make sure your new articles don't get lost as 'orphans' that are not associated with related topics. Feco

Kylie Tennant
Wy did you change the standard and Wiki-style presentation of dates (1912–1988) to the very non-standard and non-Wiki (b.1912 d.1988)? Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 21:38, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Help with Translation!?
Can you help translate this for me to swedish? Many thanks in advance!

''For a small country, Albania is endowed with considerable resources. The southwestern part of the country is rich in petroleum and natural gas. The northeastern region has substantial reserves of metallic mineral deposits, including chromium, copper, and iron-nickel. Large deposits of lignite (soft coal) are found near Tiranë, and natural asphalt is mined near Selenicë.

Albania is also rich in rivers and streams with significant hydroelectric potential. These have been exploited quite effectively, making the country an energy exporter. A number of huge hydroelectric power plants have been built, mainly on the Drin River, and more than half of the country's arable land is irrigated, largely from the artificial reservoirs created upstream of the dams.''

--Armour 14:01, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Editing Jehovah's Witnesses articles
Because of the volatile nature of religious opinion in general and opinions about Jehovah's Witnesses in particular, I am making it my goal to recommend to new and existing editors interested in JW articles to review (or re-review) Wikipedia's policies:
 * WP:NOR - no original research: your findings on Scripture have no place here
 * WP:V - verifiability: your references must be commonly verifiable
 * WP:NPOV - neutral point of view (this one is critical to JW pages edits especially): present opinions as opinions, facts as facts
 * WP:AGF - assume good faith: even if an edit is wildly divergent from what you are accustomed to, are comfortable with, or want to see in a particular article, don't assume bad motives on the part of the editor. They could be inexperienced, or have access to information that you may very well have never seen before.  This means giving the benefit of the doubt to the largest extent possible.
 * WP:CIV - Civility - "We cannot always expect people to love, honor, obey, or even respect another. But we have every right to demand civility."
 * WP:SOCK - No Sock puppets - do not use multiple accounts to bolster support for your edits, or to avoid personal attacks (see next point for how to deal with personal attacks)
 * WP:NPA - No personal attacks: calling into question someone's character, intelligence, or integrity by means of insults or condescendingly toned jabs simply because you don't like their edit or their position is unacceptable. If you keep making negative comments on the editor and not the edits, you could be banned (see WP:BAN.)
 * WP:VAND - Vandalism: what it is, what it is not, and how to deal with it.

As Wikipedia is a serious academic endeavor, it is not the place for proselytizing or promoting (or detracting from) issues of a religious or spiritual nature. Discussing the validity or failings of a particular religious viewpoint are both wastes of your time here, as they are opinions that do not contribute to the desired end result. It is expected of every editor to contribute positively, abide by the rules of the forum and stick to the facts. This will help us not only keep these articles and the discussions behind them free from ineffective and off-topic banter, but present a respectable product that addresses all sides in their proper perspectives.

It is best to ignore insults and off-topic discussions, addressing only the pertinent points so as to reach a consensus regarding the content of these pages. If you must address them, it's best to simply cite the Wikipedia standards and redirect your focus to content and format. In response to Central's warning about you, I hope you will be especially careful and personally detatched from this editing process. I hope my suggestions help. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony 15:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ak1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ak1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 05:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Please clarify
Your starting version og [[Simon Kimbangu], as well as the latest one, which didn't differ that much, looks dangerously close to the Encyclopedia Britannica entry: Please clarify the sources for your edits.
 * http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9045460

Pjacobi 17:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:RUTHERFORD.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:RUTHERFORD.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy
Hi there! I've noticed that you've edited articles pertaining to the Eastern Orthodox Church. I wanted to extend an invitation to you to join the WikiProject dedicated to organizing and improving articles on the subject, which can be found at: WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. This WikiProject was begun because a need was perceived to raise the level of quality of articles on Wikipedia which deal with the Eastern Orthodox Church.

You can find information on the project page about the WikiProject, as well as how to join and how to indicate that you are a member of the project. Additionally, you may be interested in helping out with our collaboration of the month. I hope you'll consider joining and thank you for your contributions thus far! &mdash; A.S. Damick talk contribs 03:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Summer Song Edits
Hello Summer Song, I wanted to request that you, when editing the 'Governing Body' page, please read the paragraph and condense it to a 2-3 sentence summary or paraphrase instead of just deleting it. A case in point, you made a deletion of the 'Branch Committee' stating that it had nothing to do with the 'Governing Body' but yet, the 'Governing Body' appoints members for the 'Branch Committee' and provides direction and guidance for their roles. I think it would have been better to summarize that and maybe a sentence or two about the 'Branch Committee' to shorten or condense the information and possibly providing a link to the full explanation to the 'Branch Committee'. I'll await your reply before I proceed with this course of direction. Protector of the Truth 18:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Lactarius deliciosus
Hello- Did you translate this article from Norwegian? It's a good idea to mention at the bottom of the article if it is a translation, that way people who know the original language can use the original article to adjust the English. Takk! -Eric (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

editing JW articles
I have a letter from the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses with their recommendations about editing Wikipedia articles about our faith. Please email me and I will send you a copy of the email I've sent to other JW Wikipedians. - CobaltBlueTony 18:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you read this message yet? - CobaltBlueTony 15:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Why did you move the "List of Jehovah's Witness Literature" article?
Why did you move the "List of Jehovah's Witness Literature" article? I think the title should retain "Jehovah's Witness" in it. Dtbrown 16:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Help Prevent Article Deletion: Religious Perspectives on Dinosaurs
Hello, I'm leaving you this message because I notice you've made at least one significant edit to the Wikipedia article Religious perspectives on dinosaurs. The article has recently been nominated for deletion from Wikipedia, and there is considerable support for that position.

I'm hoping you'll help me support the continued existence of the Religious perspectives on dinosaurs article by registering a keep vote on the article's request for deletion page. The article contains some good information, and represents an unobtrusive way to present notable minority viewpoints about dinosaurs that cannot reasonably be elaborated on in the parent article. It shouldn't be deleted simply because the viewpoints it presents aren't "scientific."

Thanks! Killdevil 03:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Faithful and Discreet Slave
I would recommend Insight on the Scriptures on the subject if you have access to one. I'm trying to avoid Wikipedia for now, fall term starts Monday for me. Duffer 20:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Recent Edit to Eschatology of JWs
Recently, you added this to the article:

''However, that gives no reason to think that the organization supported any type of extreme behavior. The article was meant to encourage the members to live a simple life and preach the word, maybe spending their time as pioneers.''

I'm not sure if I understand your edit. Are you saying the Organization in 1974 was not commending those who sold their homes in order to pioneer? I thought that was what the 1974 Kingdom Ministry was applauding. You also state that the Kingdom Ministry aticle "was meant to encourage the members to live a simple life and preach the word..." Isn't that reading into the article a motive? How do you know what that motive was? Shouldn't we just state what it says without interpretation? Dtbrown 04:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Marvin Shilmer
The purpose of your edit on my Talk Page is unclear. Are you disputing an edit I have made??--Jeffro77 07:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Deo Volente
I have done what you asked for Jehovah's Witnesses literature. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Merges
Hi. Yes, I agree with the article merges you suggested. I'm not doing a lot of editing for a few weeks on the JW articles because it's been getting frustrating, but I'll be around, and will be back more frequently in a while.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Jehovah's Witnesses and congregational discipline
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Jehovah's Witnesses and congregational discipline, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jehovah's Witnesses and salvation
I have nominated Jehovah's Witnesses and salvation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jehovah's Witnesses and salvation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Explodicle (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

HELP
Can you HELP me? Please watch this. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

SOS
Can you HELP me? Please watch this. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * This version in Indonesia Wikipedia is going to be deleted. Can you help me to SAY NO in its Talk in id.wiki? I don't know why they don't appreciate Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Speech. Thanks. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Kingdom Songs
I am overseas travelling and just saw your request for help regarding the 'Kingdom Songs' article. Though the content that was removed is okay, the reference provided is not. However, despite the objection made by the person who deleted it, I am quite sure that there is a supporting reference in JW literature, though I don't have the library CD with my overseas.--Jeffro77 (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Deconstructhis (talk) 23:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

New policy on date links
I just reverted you on Lommedalen. There has apparently recently been a change of consensus when ot comes to wikilinking years and dates. You can see what the guidelines state at MOS:NUM. There is some discussion on it going on, but you will notice an ongoing effort of removing incidental links to dates and years. __meco (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Governing Body
Hi. You said: "The recent version claims that "the origin of the governing body is not clear", while the previous version clearly stated that the leadership of JW before the 70's was the board of the Watchtower Society." The thing is, both are true. The origins of the formal 'Governing Body' (a proper noun, a special term, and having theological significance, also note capitalisation) was only clearly established in the 70s, and is not strictly synonymous with the leadership (prior to its formal formation).-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Rømme
Hej, såg du plockade bort Rømme från Smetena. Finns det smetena i Norge?

Warrington (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Ikke Krotekaker heller?

Warrington (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Jehovah's Witnesses project
I have started a discussion regarding the content wikipedia has regarding the Jehovah's Witnesses at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses. Seeing that you are listed as a member of that project, I would appreciate any responses to the material there you would like to make. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ministerial Training School
I have nominated Ministerial Training School, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ministerial Training School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jeffro 77 (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Don Alden Adams
I have nominated Don Alden Adams, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Don Alden Adams. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jeffro 77 (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Summer Song! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Alejandro Fuentes -
 * 2) Askil Holm -
 * 3) Terje Formoe -

Advice on getting format consensus?
Care to give me some advice here? Cordially, SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Captain Sabertooth


The article Captain Sabertooth has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable fictional character, fails WPGNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...

- Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia &bull; It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom &bull; To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Template:Did you know nominations/Lactarius deterrimus
hello,

if you don't mind I credited you here. Regards.-- GoP T C N 10:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of UTFO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UTFO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UTFO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arne Paus


The article Arne Paus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced BLP, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me!  22:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Captain Sabertooth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Captain Sabertooth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Captain Sabertooth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me!  22:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Expressive loan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Expressive loan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Expressive loan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Opposing views on Jehovah's Witnesses listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Opposing views on Jehovah&. Since you had some involvement with the Opposing views on Jehovah's Witnesses redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Websites Critical of the Watchtower Society (Jehovah's Witnesses' Organisation) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Websites Critical of the Watchtower Society (Jehovah&. Since you had some involvement with the Websites Critical of the Watchtower Society (Jehovah's Witnesses' Organisation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)