User talk:Summermaydaubney

January 2021
Hello, Kat. I should like to welcome you to editing Wikipedia. However, there are a couple of things about Wikipedia that you need to know.

Firstly, Wikipedia is not a web host for material unrelated to work for the encyclopaedia. Secondly, editing to promote anything is not permitted; that applies no matter how good a cause you may be promoting.

You are very welcome to start contributing to the encyclopaedia, in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines if you would like to, but if your only interest is in publicising information about mental health problems, then I wish you every success in doing so, but Wikipedia isn't the right place to do it. JBW (talk) 11:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Summermaydaubney (talk) 11:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Continuing with the same editing that I warned you about above
Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter. If you continue to try to use Wikipedia to promote or publicise your views and opinions then you are likely to be blocked from editing. That is not what Wikipedia is for. JBW (talk) 21:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Connie Talbot, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Blanking page and adding unrelated "Mental health is important" heading. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 17:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Connie Talbot, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Connie Talbot was changed by Summermaydaubney (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932647 on 2021-02-20T17:29:27+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Connie Talbot. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * There's means and ways to improve mental-health related articles and it's not this way. Please stop editing and take a read of About and get to know how things are done here. If you make this edit again you'll be blocked, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Never mind "the next time you vandalize Wikipedia": you have already done enough. I have blocked you indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you have no intention of contributing to the encyclopaedia in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Following your decision to ignore my warnings above, and to yet again try to use your user page to promote your campaign on mental health, I was going to block you from editing, even though you may, as I said above, have originally thought that would be acceptable. However, I then saw your repeated attempts to hijack the article Connie Talbot, and there is no way that you could possibly have thought that would be acceptable, and I can only regard it as deliberate vandalism. If you decide you would like to start editing constructively, without continuing to try to use Wikipedia as a platform for your crusade on mental health, and if you are willing to undertake to comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines in future, you may request to be unblocked. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text at the bottom of this page. JBW (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Since posting the above message I have discovered that you had already had another account blocked, for exactly the same kinds of unacceptable abusive editing, including trying to hijack articles and turn them into vehicles for writing about yourself. In view of this discovery your likelihood of persuading an administrator to unblock your account is very slim, unless you can do a very good job of persuading them that you are willing to totally change your ways. JBW (talk) 23:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)