User talk:Summersintern

Broadvision Perspectives India
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Broadvision Perspectives India, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Broadvision Perspectives. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Broadvision Perspectives India


A tag has been placed on Broadvision Perspectives India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Scopecreep (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Request with reasons for Non-Deletion
Hi, the other id which was Broadvision has been deleted as has the entry. This was done because the username was not according to wikipedia's rules. Since the page name 'Broadvision Perspectives' has been deleted too. Please revoke the order for deletion on this page, since it does not have any copied content anymore nor is the name incorrect. Would be really helpful since this page is just for providing information about new companies in India. Summersintern (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article still followed the company's website very closely, both in content and format. I would suggest starting with a draft, either in your userspace (at User:Summersintern/Draft, perhaps) or through the Articles for Creation process. Take the core of the company - what is Broadvision Perspectives? "Broadvision Perspectives is a Consulting company based in Bangalore, India." There. Now what does it do? "Founded in 2008, the company provides a range of strategic consulting services to companies in the (specify something) industry." Then, state what makes the company Notable under our policies. Something like "Broadvision is the largest such company in the region, serving X clients during 2011." or some such. Don't talk about the company's "celebrated works", as it appears that you are the one celebrating them. Similarly, don't talk about how the company "delivers innovation" to its clients; just talk about the services provided and the (notable!) companies to which those services were provided. Remember to keep it Neutral; if someone who works there would say it in a sales pitch, leave it out. Ping my talk page (or consult at WP:AFC or The Teahouse) if you require additional advice or assistance. Good luck, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sriram Chandrasekaran


The article Sriram Chandrasekaran has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Dac04 (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sriram Chandrasekaran


A tag has been placed on Sriram Chandrasekaran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Re-written article for Broadvision Perspectives India Pvt. Ltd.
Broadvision Perspectives India Pvt. Ltd., founded in 2008, is a company based out of Bangalore, India, that advises clients in the areas of Brand Strategy, Employer Branding, Brand Research, Package Design, Brand Promotions and allied People Advisory Services. Studio 56, a design, animation and VFX studio, is a subsidiary of Broadvision.

Among Broadvision Perspectives’ clients have been the Tata Brand and the Tata Administrative Services (TAS) (work done by the founder before establishing Broadvision), the Mahindra Group and Procter & Gamble (P&G).

The Founder
Sriram Chandrasekaran is the Chief Executive Officer and one of the founders of Broadvision Perspectives. Born on 22nd March at Tanjore, Tamil Nadu, Sriram grew up in Tiruchirapalli and did his schooling at Kamakoti Vidyalaya. Sriram holds a graduate degree with first class honours in Mechanical Engineering from BITS Pilani. Before pursuing a Masters in Business Administration from Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, he worked with HCL Hewlett Packard as a sales executive before being promoted to General Manager for Sales.

He worked formerly with Microsoft Corporation as Business Advisor for 3.5 years prior to which he was part of the Tata Administrative Services (TAS) of the Tata Group. While at TAS, Sriram rotated within the Group and served as General Manager (Sales & Marketing) in the Taj Group of Hotels, as Brand Manager in Tata Sons and as Marketing Manager in Tata Motors. He has a cumulative experience of 12 years in the Industry.

Along with Broadvision Perspectives, he is also the founder of Studio56, a Design, Animation & Visual Effects Studio, and serves as an Independent Director on the Board of Source Natural Foods and Health Supplements Limited, a BSE listed Food Products Company based in Hyderabad.

The Mahindra War Room (TWR)
A dipstick survey by Broadvision in 2008 showed how Brand Mahindra was still perceived as an old world company. In order to change the employer brand image of the Mahindra Group from just a tractor/jeep company to a modern company, the methods of talent attraction needed to be improved. To facilitate this Broadvision started a case study based competition called “The War Room” in that resulted in the Mahindra Group rising from no. 67 in the ACNielsen Campus Track B-School Report 2007 to no. 12 in 2010. The initiative is rolled out to the top 17 B-schools of India. The finalists get to present their ideas in front of Anand Mahindra and other Mahindra group CEO’s. The winners' trophy for this competition is called the Brahmastra trophy.

The Mahindra Group Management Cadre (GMC)
Along with “The War Room”, a uniform induction program called the Group Management Cadre was also designed to facilitate employee retention for the Mahindra Group. The program was formulated using insights from prior industry experience and the analysis of the 2007 Campus Track reports by ACNielsen. It resulted in improving the Mahindra Group's rating in the Campus Track report the following years.

The Mahindra Graduate Engineer Trainee (GET)
Along with “The War Room” and the GMC, Broadvision also helped re-design a program called the Graduate Engineer Trainee program, to improve their employer brand image in T-Schools, which has now been re-christened as “Igniters”. The changed employment proposition was communicated by conducting quizzes, paper presentations across various engineering colleges in India including the Indian Institute of Technology (IITs) and National Institute of Technology (NITs). The Mahindra Group rank improved from no. 47 in 2008 to no. 14 in 2009 in the ACNielsen Campus Track T-School Report.

Mahindra Rise
In an attempt to unify various businesses that share the Mahindra brand across geographies and add value to their products and services, the Mahindra Group repositioned themselves as “Mahindra Rise” in 2011. Brand repositioning and image building was carried out by Broadvision Perspectives by conducting dipstick researches and in-depth interviews within the industry and company.

The Proctor and Gamble (P&G) Dream Team
Proctor and Gamble (P&G) dominates as the world’s leading FMCG company. They needed new ways to attract talent, and did so by partnering with Broadvision Perspectives and initiating a new B-School event called “The Dream Team”. The competition was organised for the top 9 B-schools across the country.

Culture
Broadvision Perspectives is founded on the principles of Responsible Capitalism. The organization supports The Art of Living Foundation and their practices.

Regarding the rewritten article
The article has not been linked. But i would like some feedback. does this follow all the guidelines? Can i put this up on wikipedia. Also a few more references shall be added soon. I am just compiling them. 122.167.22.102 (talk) 13:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Not with phrases like "Broadvision Perspectives enables Business Leaders to think out of the box and power their Corporate, Consumer and Employer Brands, Leadership Pipelines and Business Strategy". The whole article is way too promotional in tone. . Mean as custard (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

That sentence you have stated as promotional has been taken from their website. It is a good company that has nil information available online about it. So some parts will come from their website. And all the parts that have that tone have been cited. Its not promotional but this write up is only stating what they have done. I hope this is okay. Else everything we write can be called promotional. Summersintern (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You clearly do not understand the purpose of Wikpedia, and I suggest you do not edit any articles about companies, products etc. which can be given a promotional slant. Stick to editing articles on stick insects, Chinese porcelain, Elizabethan musical instruments and similar subjects which are not susceptible to advertising. . . Mean as custard (talk) 10:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

The comments above include some of the issues I saw. It's fine to review what the company's website says about its own business, but that doesn't mean that we include it here. Remember, we're supposed to be neutral in tone. Whatever the company is saying about itself, it's not exactly going to be unbiased about itself, yes? So we don't include language like the quote above - replace it with "Broadvision Perspectives consults with corporate and consumer clients on matters of organizational structure and business strategy." You still highlight the name of the company, who they work with, and what they do. The neutral position is one that does not applaud the company nor exert emotion in describing it, nor does a neutral position condemn its activities or its competitors. Rather, it simply states facts without emotional weight or heft. Broadvision Perspectives is X, it does Y, and so forth. It can be a bit stale, but the goal is to inform - not to entertain or promote. Keep at it, and good luck. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. could you also tell me if the other parts are okay? I made changes according to what you told me. The projects also say just about what they do. I have never written a wiki article, so any constructive help would be super welcome. have toned it down as much as possible.Summersintern (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * It looks much better. There are still some bits that could probably be a little more neutral, but I think it's close enough. I'm a bit concerned about the length of the section on the company's founder, as it is a large percentage of the article. It's also unsourced. Consider trimming that down until you can find (independent!) sources that describe Mr. Chandrasekaran. And, if you find those sources, it's possible that a separate article would be more appropriate. As for showing up on the Google search, that's nothing we can control - Google's servers have to actually find the article first, which can take some time. Be patient. You may also want to consider moving it to a simpler name - Broadvision Perspectives would seem to be the logical choice. The article already identifies the firm as an Indian company, and the Pvt. and Ltd. are unnecessary in the title. A simpler search term might make it easier to find, both in our own search and via google. Best, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * ...Not sure, honestly. I've trimmed the section and added a line acknowledging him as the founder and CEO. If there are parts of the founder section that directly relate to Broadvision, feel free to re-add them. But look at it this way, how is the company impacted by where Mr. Chandrasekaran went to university, or by how long he worked at a previous employer? Removing the section narrows the focus of the article, which goes a long way toward improving the article. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The idea is that his importance does not transfer to the company - under our rules. A more prestigious CEO might be of some benefit to the company's stature in general, but here it has a flavor of promotion. Since there has been some concern about promotional aspects in this article, I thought it best to err on the conservative side. Obviously, relevant experience should be mentioned, but remember that the article has to focus squarely on the company. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I still think it's too much, but won't remove it - other editors may see fit to do so, though. The best source would be one that talks about something like "New company Broadvision Perspectives formed" and then talks about the guy making it happen - the CEO. That would flesh out both the CEO's experience AND tie it directly to the company. Does such a source exist? I dunno. Either way, you've done good work here. Best, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Broadvision Perspectives for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broadvision Perspectives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Broadvision Perspectives until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Broadvisionlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Broadvisionlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MICA Official Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MICA Official Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)