User talk:Sumomox4nouchi/sandbox

Aleena's Peer Review
The curriculum section is great, however since its a new section I would go into more detail of the teacher training for refugee students to clarify the curriculum given to students. I would this to the section modern context as well as you touch upon teacher training again. I feel like a few of your sections like the space section should either be added to an already existing section or be expanded more. However, your draft is very neutral which is great, and overall everything sounds perfect!

Response to Peer Review
Thank Aleena, I really appreciated your feedback, and I do intend to revise and add in the spaces you suggested. My main concern from here on out is not having the sources to add information, since little academic work has been done on OIHS, especially regarding the teacher section which we both agree I should add to. I think that it should be OK to add in information I've witnessed at the school, but not tie in an opinions or statements of efficacy. Do you think that would be okay? For example, I could write a few sentences on how the block schedule allows teachers to do multiple types of language activities in a given period, based off of my observation. Then, perhaps I could follow up by providing information from academic sources on how classroom activity variety can keep students engaged and interested for longer. Still, I proceed with caution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumomox4nouchi (talk • contribs) 04:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)