User talk:Sun4hr

Welcome
Hello, I'm HurricaneTracker495. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I hope you are well. Thank you for reaching out to me for clarification. Please note that I have given references to the article from the most reputed newspapers/ channels (Dawn, The News, Geo TV) in Pakistan. Therefore, I request you to consider them and let the added references to the article get published.

Thank you for your attention and consideration.--Sun4hr (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tanveer Jahan


The article Tanveer Jahan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Northern Escapee (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reaching out to me. Please note that I have given references to the article from the reputed English newspapers (Dawn, The News, Daily Times) in Pakistan. Thank you for your attention, cooperation, and consideration. --Sun4hr (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I have added several references to the articles, and have addressed the issues highlighted in the template. thank you --Sun4hr (talk) 08:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Sun4hr. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nida Usman Chaudhary


A tag has been placed on Nida Usman Chaudhary, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of lums.edu.pk/events/lums-live-session-47-remembering-justice-ginsburg-confronting-womens-challenges-pakistans and learnpak.com.pk/our-team. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for considering my request and unblocking my account which remained blocked for four months. Please note that two of the pages namely Draft:Anjum James Paul and Draft:Peter Jacob that I contributed, were moved from mainspace to the drafts during the time when my account was blocked, therefore I humbly request you to move the pages back to the mainspace, and also remove the block template from my user page. Thank you so much for your cooperation in anticipation.--Sun4hr (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You can edit your own user page. You'll need to go through WP:AfC to move those pages back to mainspace, though perhaps User:GSS, who moved them to draft, might be willing to do it for you. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 14:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Please note that my account has been unblocked four months after it was blocked, therefore I humbly request you to move the pages Draft:Anjum James Paul and Draft:Peter Jacob back to mainspace, that I contributed to Wikipedia. Thank you so much for your cooperation in anticipation.--Sun4hr (talk) 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tanveer Jahan
Hello, Sun4hr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tanveer Jahan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Anjum James Paul moved to draftspace
I've moved Anjum James Paul to Draft:Anjum James Paul. As per the requirements of your account unblocking this needs to go through WP:AfC. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anjum James Paul
Hello, Sun4hr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anjum James Paul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Jacob (August 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeverTry4Me was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Jacob and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Peter_Jacob Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NeverTry4Me&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Peter_Jacob reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)