User talk:SunAlsoRises

The Awareness Center.
I have reverted your edits at The Awareness Center - please read Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, reliable sources, and neutrality before editing again. -- Jeandré, 2007-02-14t21:37z


 * Jeandre, I do not understand your reversion. It is your version, presenting only a one-sided positive view of this controversial group, which violates neutrality. The quotes from Marc Dratch and the JTA article are obviously part of NPOV. SunAlsoRises, 2007-02-14t 23:44 UTC


 * Discussion now at Talk:The Awareness Center. -- Jeandré, 2007-02-15t07:29z

Your recent comments

 * If you have evidence a single Wikipdia user has been editing with multiple accounts for purposes of "stacking" discussions and making a particular viewpoint appear to have more support than it has, you can make a complaint on Suspected Sock Puppets and administrators will look into it. (Wikipedia calls a second account used for manipulative purposes a Sockpuppet). Feel free to ask for help in filling out the form if you run into any difficulty. If someone is simply using a pseudonym for privacy purposes and isn't violating any rules, please respect their privacy. Best, --Shirahadasha 03:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

The Awareness Center reprise - December 2007
In your edits you appear to have inadvertently removed most of the external links section, which had contained links to several newspaper articles discussing The Awareness Center. Would you have a problem with my restoring these links? If you don't mind I'll simply restore them myself, otherwise I'll ask another admin to review since I protected the page. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 15:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and restored only the links, leaving the other edits intact. Most of the deleted links are links to newspaper articles and other reliable sources mentioning The Awareness Center. These sources may be needed to source claims about disputed information and help resolve the dispute. I wouldn't remove links to sources until it's clear what's needed and what's not. In particular, these sources may possibly be able to source some of the content that you deleted as unsourced, and I believe they should remain in the article for the time being to allow time to investigate whether this is the case or not. I am assuming both your edits and your delete were done in good faith. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 15:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)