User talk:SunCountryGuy01/Archives/5

User talk:SaveDisassembledBeings
Hello. I removed your welcome template at User talk:SaveDisassembledBeings. This guy is an IP vandal that I guess decided to get an account. BurtAlert (talk) 22:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of FBI Atlanta Field Office
Hello! Your submission of FBI Atlanta Field Office at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Interior (Talk) 05:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Fritz Joubert Duquesne Article
SunCountryGuy01,

Article: Fritz Joubert Duquesne

I've noticed that it's a featured biography on the WP:WikiProject Intelligence, shouldn't the assessment banner be included on his talkpage? Adamdaley (talk) 09:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

HI, about a AFC decline
Hey, can you explain which part of the MOS Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Easily Ltd violates? Yoenit (talk) 12:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Yoenit, I am not going to beat around the bush with this article. It is a great start. You have done an awesome job with referencing and citations and structure. However I have something like an official AfC rule book (And I actually have a book) and the first thing I look at is the lead section. If the submission doesn't have a lead section I rarely look at it. But your submission I, for some reason, read from top to bottom. You may want to put an infobox in the submission as, while it is not mandatory, I does make information more easily accessed. The correct infobox for this article would probably be this one: Template:Infobox company. If you are unaware of how this is don please respond on my talk page. Also I would suggest you read this page: Manual of Style (lead section) before placing the lead section in. Cheers. Jessy   T/C 00:21, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * , I am not the article creator and not a new editor either. I also see that the article misses a lead and infobox, but I fail to see how something so minor is a reason for rejecting. Yoenit (talk) 07:49, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Afc decline, Intimate relationship skills
Dear SunCountryGuy01,

Thanks for taking the time to read this article.

Could you please list the specific numbers of the 32 references which look like advertisements so I can re-word them?

Any edits/suggestions you can make to this Discussion tab would greatly help development of the article too.

Many thanks


 * Geoffjw1978 (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Surfers At Cardiff Reef.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Surfers At Cardiff Reef.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought It was inappropriate to place the template on my user talk page. If you would have taken the time out of your presumably busy schedule to review the File upload request. To make it quicker so I do not intrude on your schedule here is a link. Jessy   T/C 01:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't want to discuss this. What you need to do is supply evidence of permission for the photo. If you don't, it'll be deleted.
 * Here you want to be rude here is your evidence: "I give permission for it to be used on wikipedia". The exact words of the user himself. Jessy   T/C 02:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And just how does "permission for it to be used on wikipedia" equate to a CC license? Besides, he needs to let OTRS know about that via email as the template says. Eeekster (talk) 02:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've just replied to an email that came into OTRS about this image, so we're working on it. In the meantime, for future reference, if it's been previously published anywhere else they will have to go through the donation process so we can verify authorship, and any sort of release (even at WP:FFU) needs to explicitly state a specific license. "Permission to use on Wikipedia" or similar is an immediate speedy deletion reason. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Abuse response nomination
Hi there SunCountryGuy01,

You have some questions to answer at Abuse response/Nominate, while you are a great content contributor there is a general consensus by active project members that you should participate in the administrative areas of Wikipedia (WP:ANI discussions, WP:COIN, clerking at WP:CHU, participating in WP:ACC). I hope you continue to contribute positively to Wikipedia as you do now. —  Ancient Apparition •  Champagne?  • 12:37pm • 01:37, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

RE: AutoWikiBrowser
Hi SunCountryGuy. I don't know how much help I'm gonna be. I just got the tool earlier this week, and I've pretty much been using the Disambiguate links steps that are in the User manual and the find-replaces. If you have a specific question, I might be able to help, but if you want detailed info, you might want to find someone with more experience. I know User:Kollision has quite a bit of experience with the it. Sorry! BOVINEBOY 2008 03:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

User talk:SunCountryGuy01/Editnotice
You may notice that this editnotice is there, MBisanz moved it. What I deleted was a redirect to it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I dont mean to ask to much of you but could you please place AutoWikiBrowser on my account. Jessy   T/C 23:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Courcelles did it already, not too much to ask. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Re:
 Tide  rolls  02:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Tagging
Could you explain the reason for tagging this article? Cheers, Number   5  7  16:45, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I would suggest you read the links provided. Jessy   T/C 01:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I would suggest you actually answer the question, because as far as I can see the coding of the article is fine. Number   5  7  09:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Update Needed.....
What's happening with WP:WikiProject Intellignece? Doesn't seem it is moving forward with a couple of articles. Have you been able to convince The Bushranger to join or has he declined? If nothing happens soon especially with communication between members of the WP:WikiProject Intellignece, then I will have to reconsider my position. So far I've tried my best to help you get it off the ground, but there has been no communication between us, much. More of username changing on your part. I don't even know what to call you, since you've had so many usernames, since I have first seen you on Wikipedia. I hope you will reply because I will appreciate it if you gave me an update to what is going on. Adamdaley (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have addressed the matters you have briught to my attention. I have urged Bushranger to put his two cents into the WP Intelligence and WP Espionage merger and I have asked him to tell me whether he would like to stay or leave the WikiProject Itelligence. Also I have no idea what you are talking about in reference to my name change. I changed my name one because I was harrassed by another user by email. I will reapeat I changed my name ONCE. My name is SunCountryGuy01. Just so there is no confusion, you may see my user name in my signature as SunCountryGuy012 because I am not at home and I am using a public computer at my university. Cheers. SunCountryGuy012(talk) 16:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Message from Poderedellaluna
Hi SunCountryGuy01.. This is Poderedellaluna writing.. Ihave struggle for a long time with the article about the Blackbird, The Black Stone Violin.. You among others have declined the article; "This submission has been declined. The reviewer left the following comment: "This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the speedy deletion criteria (A7) and/or guidelines on notability. Please provide more information on why the subject is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you." If I should try to answer U WHY the subject is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, I would like to just say that the Violin is the only playable stone violin in the World.. Its an unic piece of ART! and its incloses elements of all "kingdoms" of the Earth, like Plants/ebenholtz, Animals/Mamuth ivory, Diabas- as some refer to as Black granite, and ofcourse the Human who made it and make it alive by playing on it.. The Swedish King and Queen came to see it and lissened to its unic sound.. U can as well if U go to the site: noisejunk.. Even the late Pope Johannes Paulus wanted to see it and blessed it.. Almost making it a Relik.. If U would look at the work in thouse References attached to the article, Iam sure U would change opinion about the Violin! I would be very happy if U could give me some idea what to change in the article and how I could add some photos of it, to the Wikipedia.. Thanks, looking forward to hear from U.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poderedellaluna (talk • contribs) (Copied from your userpage by  Swarm   X 19:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC))

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Alternate Account
I read here that this is your alternate account. It is helpful for you to say what account your normally edit under, which is covered under WP:SOCK. It just helps other users know who you normally are. :) Take Care... Neutralhomer  •  Talk  •  Coor. Online Amb'dor  • 02:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This is my main account i just made a mistake. Jessy   T/C 02:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Just seen your follow-up post, no worries. :) -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  •  Coor. Online Amb'dor  • 02:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandbox/Billy Ray Cyrus awards and nominations
A tag has been placed on Sandbox/Billy Ray Cyrus awards and nominations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Guestbook
Thanks for signing my guestbook and a barnstar for it.
 * Thanks for the barnstar. You rock. Jessy   T/C 20:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks you crazy monkey. Jessy  (SCG01)  22:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Re:George Cooper Filmmaker
I have speedied that article, but for several reasons you should not close that AFD, as you did before asking me. Please do not do that again. I'll explain why if this is unclear from my edit summary on the AFD page. Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * (The relevant page is WP:NAC, and I would really encourage you not to close any XFDs until you have had significantly more experience.)  Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RBPF Corporal.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:RBPF Corporal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  20:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Please note that all of the images in that series (the 11 rank images at Royal Bahamas Police Force) have been removed. Their use constituted an inappropriate use of fair use images for two reasons. First, having a gallery of rank badges does not add significant encyclopedic value compared to simply listing the ranks, and secondly because 11 non-free images is not "minimal use", it's overuse.


 * Also removed was File:E Greenslade.jpg as it was a non-free image of a living person, another violation of the Non-free content criteria.


 * Please note that filemovers are expected to know image policy before being given the right. You are being held to a high standard because of this, I should not have to explain this to you.


 * Well, cheers,  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * SunCountryGuy01, I have revoked the Filemover right from this account based on your inadequate knowledge of image policies as shown above. You were denied the tool twice at WP:RFP/F before you asked an admin for the tool on their talk page as a means to game the system. If you would like the tool (after reading and understanding the policies) you will have to request it at WP:RFP/F.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  23:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And for using it to revert Sven's enforcement of WP:NFC, you've lost your rollback rights as well.
 * I think you would benefit from slowing down, getting to know Wikipedia a bit better and reading up on policies and guidelines. Maybe try writing some articles before getting overly involved with the behind-the-scenes stuff. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Tags on articles
Hi. I see absolutely no reason at all for putting a 'Wikify' tag on this article, and your response to User:Number 57 was uncalled for and unhelpful. Please read WP:NPP and consider improving your own knowledge about the way Wikipedia works before reviewing the work of others, and if you need any help in understanding our criteria for quality, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for having an account used by multiple people, which is expressly prohibited.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Quick explanation for anyone seeing this; SunCountryGuy01, while chatting on IRC, directly stated that he and a friend (of sorts) used this account, and then exhausted any remaining supplies of good faith by repeatedly lying about the extent. It is rather difficult to set unblock conditions since I can't actually trust a word he says. Ironholds (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, that sucks. I saw that he was BLOCKED according to popups, and came over to see what was wrong. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I am curious, The account has been compromised, according to what you are saying. Does that mean the person is allowed to create a new account? If yes, has the user been notified of this corrective action? If not, is there a reason for going beyond what the policy states for a compromised account? Also, are you able to say with certainty that the user at IRC was this user, and not an impostor, or saboteur? I hope you don't consider my asking this, out of line, or an aspersion of some kind. I am only curious to ensure all manner of AGF has been exhausted. Best regards. My76Strat (talk) 09:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know the history - is it absolutely definite tha it was the WP account that was being talked about and not the IRC account? Pesky  ( talk ) 11:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It's not a compromised account; the user maintains that the account was used with their permission;
 * 2) yes;
 * 3) yes. Ironholds (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to appear dense; the number of questions exceeds the number of your answers. could you please clarify which answers relate to which questions? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to take so long to get back to you; the important ones -


 * 1) It's not compromised, since he maintains it was done with permission
 * 2) The IRC user was familiar with the same areas and, more importantly, asking questions and making edits while chatting.
 * 3) Yup; the conversation was definitely about the en-wiki account. Ironholds (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Anthony, He gave the answers for every question except the last one which was:

Also, are you able to say with certainty that the user at IRC was this user, and not an impostor, or saboteur?. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 21:56, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

lack of experience
I don't know if you were seriously trying to fulfill the candidate's request or doing it for a laugh (it certainly gave me one). However, 'strong oppose per lack of experience' in what's otherwise a pile-on over incivility-- well done.  Swarm   X 16:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This !vote

Unblocked
I've unblocked you, per our conversations by email. Make sure you don't let anybody else use your account in future. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   11:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I will most definitely refrain from letting any other person use my account. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 12:33, April 7, 2011 (UTC) 12:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Welcome back, let's hope that doesn't happen again, eh ;) Did you still want to be on the RFA task force?  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 12:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Lord knows I dont want that to happen again. Yes I still want to be on the task force. RfA system still needs a lot of reform. Cheers. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 13:04, April 7, 2011 (UTC) 13:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Good-o. You've got a bit of reading to do... but I've restored your name.  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 13:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Welcome back to the Task Force. Don't stress out too much, it's only human to make the odd stupid mistake from time to time.  Take good care of yourself :o)  Pesky  ( talk ) 11:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

picture
A picture of Walcott is a great idea. But then there is the copyright issue. Gogue2 (talk) 21:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Seriouser
Hello &mdash; I'm just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Seriouser, a page you tagged, because of the following concern: '''It's not patent nonsense. It may be a hoax, but the intended meaning is clear.''' Let me know if you have any questions. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 22:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have requested speedy deletion under the blatant hoax criteria. I guess I need a little tidying up in the CSD department. Still a little lost from my recent block. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 22:07, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. Gfoley4 invoked the (controversial) IAR speedy deletion criteria; I'm not sure why, since it qualified under G3. Also, don't stress out over having been blocked &mdash; it's happened to some of our best users (even Jimbo!) Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 05:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Badminton at the 2011 Pan American Games – Mixed doubles
Hello SunCountryGuy01. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Badminton at the 2011 Pan American Games – Mixed doubles, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have taken a look at your nominations for speedy deletion and I have deleted something; however, I have left two. I don't think they should be deleted, but I'll let you receive a second opinion. David Lee Smith is not an unequivocal copyvio of this, from what I can see. And Luna The Hedgehog cannot be speedied, in my opinion, because it's an article about a fictional character and does not fall within the purview of db-web, for me, at least, even though it is a bit of a borderline case... Salvio  Let's talk about it! 22:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Luna the hedgehog appears to be a character in a utterly non-notable youtube series of the same name . I can't fault Suncountryguy for nominating it for speedy. Do you really intend to bring it to AFD? Yoenit (talk) 22:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand it - that's why I did not decline the speedy -; in such a case, however, I believe a PROD would be best. That said, if another admin wants to delete the page per WP:IAR or as a definite WP:SNOW, I'll most definitely not object. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 22:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * fair enough. Yoenit (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And someone else did get to it in the end...  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 22:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

ACC
I just requested access to tools to become a member of the Wikipedia Account Creation Team. I would like to become a member of the ACC to help users have access to tools that user who are registered have access to. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 22:45, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume all the messages about "16 permissions in a month is too much" just went over your head? Ironholds (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please read the massage above I requested access to tools to help other users create accounts. Plus ACC wasn't a userright last time I checked. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 22:53, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Account creator is a userright...  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I requested membership on the Account Creation Team. Sorry for the misunderstanding. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 22:58, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume you did not read the qualifications? Yoenit (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

per Ironholds et al. delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 02:20, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I expected that. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 02:23, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Addendum : You already had a declined request to join ACC under your former user name from all of 3 weeks ago. Your creating a second account on the ACC tool with your application today (numbers 799 & now 805 too) would be sockpuppetry at ACC. It is also not in keeping with appealing declined applications and heeding any counsel given in the initial decline reason from Pmlineditor. Consider the advice in my declining your application redundant to being declined for multiple accounts at ACC. delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 02:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I thought we agreed the hat seeking was going to stop and you were going to make yourself useful in the mainpsace? If you keep this up, I will go to AN and get consensus to ban you from requesting any permissions, access or rights for a year. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   12:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Bored
I see you found something to do but here are a couple of ideas anyways:
 * Wikify drive is happening right now
 * Look up coordinates using this tool. I find it is rewarding to look up coordinates for places in my immediate vicinity. Category:Articles needing coordinates -- Diannaa (Talk) 23:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Broken signatures
Your talk page posts are all signed as either of the following: 01:09, April 8, 2011 (UTC) 01:09, April 8, 2011 (UTC) 01:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC) The correct format is: 01:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC) Please don't use non-standard date/time stamps in your signature. They are incompatible with the gadget that converts timestamps to local time and the presence of duplicate times is even more confusing. Thank you for your attention to this matter. —UncleDouggie (talk) 04:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks I have corrected this. Cheers. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) • 04:25, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * It still doesn't work with my "local time" preference. Maybe remove the link to UTC? — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 04:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

About the red links in the "Giovanni Battista Rizza" entry
Hello SunCountryGuy01, I saw that you removed the red links about Integral representation, Lucilla Bassotti and Rizza manifold , so I wrote to ask you if mine practice of placing links to future projects (still not existing entries) is considered as a bad practice somewhere in Wikipedia: I did it so many other times. Ah, also I want to praise your new section button: it is very friendly and relaxing. :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It isn't an exact Wikipedia policy to not have red links on an article. Actually they are welcome and you are completely welcomed to place tham back. I just thought they were placed in the wrong spots. Firstly, no editor will create an article on Integral representation. It has already been created I am assured. Where I dont know. And I did my research on Lucilla Bassoti, she is not a notable subject for a Wikpedia article therefore making it difficult to make the article seem important and not worthy of AfD. And when I removed the Rizza manifold link I just was removing it because I thought it was an non-otable subject as well. I will reiterate, if you want to place them back it is completely within your rights to do so. Thanks and cheers. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •  16:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I see that you had some good reason to do so, (can I call you so?) Jesse. Obviously I am not going to revert your edits, since there is no reason: I did this only once, but the guy was a true villain and also he deleted edits only on the basis of his own prejudices, without ever considering the citation in referred journals I gave him, a entirely different situation. However, I still have a few other questions:
 * Can you give me the name of someone who has been involved in the "integral representation" entry affair? I think this is the right choice, but I would like to know the details: if it is possible, I would like to know who assured you about that. Well, if you cannot, no problem, I'll ask to an expert.
 * Probably Lucilla Bassotti is not notable and it would be a long time lasting redlink (if not a eternal one :D), even if she won the Antonio Feltrinelli Prize in 1986: but I do not understand why do you think that Rizza manifold is not a notable Wikipedia. It is a topic on complex differential geometry and it is not mainstream: it is a complex manifolds supporting a Finsler structure, first studied by Giovanni Battista Rizza as Shoshichi Kobayashi acknowledges (, I did not place this reference in the entry yesterday, so this may have confused you). Why do you think this topic is not notable?
 * Ok, I think this is all. Thank you for your attention and best regards. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, the link about Lucilla Bassotti would be a redlink for quite sometime before an article is created unless you created it. She is on the borderline of notable. And in reference to the Integral representation link, I dont think the article is covered because I dont see it here. You should probably create if you are an expert in that area. If you need help with cleanup or wikification. I am your man. Not really the best person to go to in reference to math. Could give you a couple websites to find good references that meet policy if you need them. I am not a mathematician so I would no about the Rizza manifold link. In all honesty I thought that that was a link to a person. I removed the links because I dont really like to see redlinks. I think it is untidy but that is my opinion. Thats all I think. Have anymore questions you know where to find me. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •  19:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

This follows up a block, almost 20 requests for userrights because you claim to know what you're doing, and repeated speedy deletion declines. SCG, editing Wikipedia involves understanding the policies behind it, and you simply don't. Before giving advice to a user about notability, or tagging articles for deletion, read WP:GNG, WP:ACADEMIC and associated pages - familiarise yourself with them. If you don't, this will probably be a very short stay. Ironholds (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So, to summarise, SCG:
 * 1) You removed one link because it links to something that's already been created. You don't know where it's been created, you have no idea if it's been created, but you're sure it has.
 * 2) You removed another link because you had researched the individual and found she was not notable, despite the fact that our inclusion guidelines cover people who have won prestigious awards and consider them automatically worthy of inclusion.
 * 3) You removed a third link because you thought this was also non-notable. You are not a mathematician, you have, as far as I'm aware, no mathematical training, and have presented zero evidence in support of your assertions.
 * Ironhols, Please check the facts. Dont you see redlinks on all most all of the speedy deletion decline notices with the exception of that article on the Pan-Am games. In my opinion that article is a template rather than an article. It has no meaningful content and just states that information that all of them state with no actual information about Badminton at the Pan-Am games this year. But I have talked to two people who think that it should stay so I will lay off the article. As for your questions about the article I took the redlink off of. read the respons above, I think you'll find your answers there. And I have been so PO about everybody ratting about my userrights request I did my own research. I have made 9 user rights request this month with the inclusion of my adminship bid. I made 16 for the entire time I had an account on Wikipedia. If you are going to rat on me at least get your facts right. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •  19:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I did read the above response; you'll not I replied to it, and might consider actually addressing the issues raised. Look up the meaning of the phrase "to rat on", and consider that "I've only made nine userrights requests this month" is probably the worst excuse I've ever heard when we're only 8 days in. Ironholds (talk) 20:20, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant I have made nine userrights requests last month and none this month and that is how it will stay. I need more experience before I ever see another user permissions page again. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •


 * And I would advise you to follow the same approach in every other field; familiarise yourself with policy before acting in an area. Ironholds (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Jessy, I have decided to restore all redlinks in the "Giovanni Battista Rizza" entry except for the "integral representation" one: this last deserves a more complete discussion on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics, since it can be a source for ambiguous edits (to be honest, integral representations are as old as the integral). However, I'll appreciate very much you explanations, and your help offer. I'll surely ask for it when I need it, thank you.
 * Ironholds, again thank you for the two links you gave above: I admit that up until now I looked to them only very seldom, since I worked mainly on extremely (let me say so) notable mathematical subjects and people, but now, as I am starting to edit about less known ones, they'll be extremely useful to me.
 * To both of you: you have shown me that even two contrasting Wikipedia editors with different views be helpful (even in very different senses). I think this is one of the richness of the Wikipedia, that should be preserved. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 20:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: How to care for a dog
Hello SunCountryGuy01, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on How to care for a dog to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Understandable, I was going to do the same thing any way. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •23:27, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Bad faith speedy deletion
Way to go-bad faith speedy tagging referenced content.

Are you for real?Rememberway (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you pease giv me a diff showing where I did this. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •  23:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Your nomination of Vi Hart for deletion I assume - you were just on this guys talkpage about an hour ago. Bob House 884 (talk) 23:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Oversight
Hi, I just wanted to confirm the edits that you said were oversighted from your talk page are deleted, as discussed in email. Did you perhaps email the oversight-l list to request the oversighting? Yes, if the edits were still visible, that could be a problem with the system, which is why it is important to look in to this. Prodego talk  00:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I emailed an oversight at his personal address so that the email could not be traced on Wikipedia just to be on the safe side. ''' Jessy  ( talk ) ( contribs ) •  00:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to bring up harassing edits about you, but perhaps you could search your sent email and find out which oversighter you emailed? Or did you use the Special:Emailuser feature? This was probably this week I take it? Prodego  talk  00:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Please email me or the Arbitration Committee about this, SunCountryGuy01. I have some concerns about what you are suggesting here. Risker (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Email received, I have sent you a response, and will look forward to hearing back from you. Risker (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Confirming, for the record, that no edits to this page have been either suppressed or oversighted. Risker (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have also checked the logs for this talk page, user page, and archives and find no evidence of suppression or revision deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of World Intelligence Task Force
World Intelligence Task Force, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:World Intelligence Task Force and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of World Intelligence Task Force during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nima1024 (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Simon Seville.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Simon Seville.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Witness Insecurity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Witness Insecurity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Witness Insecurity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Ce ra don  talk contribs   17:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)
Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:


 * Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasit &#124; c 17:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Better source request for File:BMES Crest.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:BMES Crest.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 02:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:User Intelbox
Template:User Intelbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 05:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)