User talk:Sunayanaa

Image tagging for Image:Msg1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Msg1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Parur Sundaram Iyer}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --W.marsh 02:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Professor Parur Sundaram Iyer
A tag has been placed on Professor Parur Sundaram Iyer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard(Bloom) 03:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Professor Parur Sundaram Iyer
A tag has been placed on Professor Parur Sundaram Iyer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Alinnisawest(talk) 06:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sangeethapriya


A tag has been placed on Sangeethapriya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Sangeethapriya and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pushpa Mittra Bhargava


The article Pushpa Mittra Bhargava has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit to article Gravitation
A discussion is currently taking place on the talk page of the article Gravitation about the information added to the article with of yours. Unless a reliable source can be found to confirm this information, it will very likely be removed from the article. I invite you to join the discussion. David Wilson (talk · cont) 09:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Speed of light
Hi, such a claim cannot be added to articles without a reference. Where is the source of that claim? --mfb (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Sundar Pichai
Can you please tell me what your source is for this edit? 220  of  Borg 14:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Your addition to Pichaikkaran has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Diff: The plot summary you added can be found almost verbatim here. Plot summaries must be written in your own words, not copied, or even closely paraphrased, from other sources.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thirumalaisamudram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pincode. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your edits
Sorry, but I've reverted both. The source for the atom claim was a self-published book by a WP:Fringe author. See WP:VERIFY. The Yazidis material had no source and I couldn't find any serious studies mentioning the connection, which is what we'd need. Doug Weller talk 09:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your edit to Newton's law of universal gravitation
Regarding your edit to Newton's law of universal gravitation: I have reverted for a number of reasons. It had bad grammar, forces are acting instead of pointing, and most importantly, the source that you added is not appropriate, as it says "A little known school of scholars...", which means that the added content is probably wp:UNDUE and might even be wp:FRINGE. If independent reliable wp:secondary sources can be found for this, you can propose it on the article talk page. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 09:36, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: I noticed that you have made many similar edits along this line in the past, so please be careful: such behaviour can lead to a wp:block. - DVdm (talk) 09:38, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:DVdm. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: referring to the edit summary of this edit. - DVdm (talk) 09:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Newton's law of universal gravitation. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Note regarding the —repeated— undo by user of this edit: Wikipedia is not a reliable source, which may look strange, but please see wp:Circular. - DVdm (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tilicho Lake. - DVdm (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)