User talk:Sundaram Muraly

Sundaram Muraly (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)WHAT ANNA DID?

1.	He has given a strong Jana Lokpal Bill which can substantially reduce the level of corruption.

2.	He says the said bill has a potential of bringing down the level of corruption by 60% to 65%.

3.	He further said if that does not happen, he would be prepared to work as a domestic servant in the house of Sri Kapil Sibbal.

WHAT NEXT:

4.	Now the issue is how to get the said bill converted into an Act – The law of the Land.

5.	This can be done only when the said bill is introduced in the Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha.

6.	After introduction, the same is to be passed by both the Houses.

INTRODUCTION OF BILL IN PARLIAMENT:

7.	Sri Varun Gandhi has volunteered to introduce the said bill in Lok Sabha as a private bill.

8.	Now the issue is how to get it Passed.

PASSING OF THE BILL:

9.	There are 550 members in Lok Sabha and 250 members in Rajya Sabha.

10.	Lok Sabha: (550 members) 10% of the members are those members who could be said to belong to the “CORE GROUP” irrespective of the parties to which they belong to.

CORE GROUP MEMBERS

11.	These ‘core group members’ enjoy the Lion’s share of the fruit of the corruption cake. Hence the core group members will never like to see that the said bill is passed in the Lok Sabha.

12.	Hence if we would try to convince the core group members that will not yield any result, not to talk of fruitful result. We shall be wasting our energy and time in convincing those 10% core group members.

ORDINARY MEMBERS

13.	As a natural corollary, our target should be 90% ordinary members.

14.	Now the issue is how to convince the 90% ordinary members.

15.	Give & Take: A candidate contesting a Lok Sabha election needs money to the tune of 1 to 10 crores. Hence, he resorts to corrupt means to acquire such money.

16.	If any MP is assured of the fact that in the next election he will get the required vote to continue to be an MP, without his spending a penny, he may be tempted to consider the proposal put forth before him.

WHO CAN GIVE SUCH ASSURANCE?

17.	Voters of his constituency can give such assurances.

IMPEDIMENTS:

18.	A whip from the party to whom the MP belongs to may come in his way as impediments & put the MP in dilemma.

HOW TO REMOVE SUCH DILEMA:

19.	It is a matter of common sense that the interest of the party is above the individual interest & interest of the nation is above the interest of any party & individual.

20.	Hence, individual should give way to the party & party should give way to the Nation.

21.	Whenever there is a conflict of Interest of Nation & Party, one should sacrifice the interest of party for the Nation.

Sundaram Muraly (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)