User talk:Sunderland5

Proposed deletion of Republic of wallace
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Republic of wallace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable micronation. 2 Ghits. Self-sourced

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wperdue (talk) 17:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raymond De Motte


The article Raymond De Motte has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP, with only a single claim of notability, restarting a mine. Not only does this seem to be a case of WP:BLP1E, independent secondary sourcing on the subject is lacking.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)