User talk:Suneet87

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Suneet Saxena
Hi Suneet87,

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed you created the article Suneet Saxena; your username suggests you may have a conflict of interest. As a rule, Wikipedians are discouraged from working substantially on articles about subjects with which they are personally associated or involved. You can read up on the policy, and what you should do about it, here. In a nutshell: If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1.	editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;

2.	participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;

3.	linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,

4.	avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Many thanks. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Suraj Kund Craft Mela
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Suraj Kund Craft Mela, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Suraj Kund Craft Mela appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Suraj Kund Craft Mela has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Suraj Kund Craft Mela and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Suraj Kund Craft Mela with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Suraj Kund Craft Mela.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Exxolon (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Funcity bareilly.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Funcity bareilly.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Boond bly.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Boond bly.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of X.I.M.E. Premier League (X.P.L.)


The article X.I.M.E. Premier League (X.P.L.) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Intracompany sports tournament with no assertion of notability outside the company.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of X.I.M.E. Premier League (X.P.L.)


A tag has been placed on X.I.M.E. Premier League (X.P.L.), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-notable cricket league per WP:CRIN

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhagyalakshmi temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fun City (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Fun City (disambiguation), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 01:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fun City (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Fun City (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 01:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Neighbourhoods of Bareilly
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Neighbourhoods of Bareilly, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Neighborhoods of Bareilly. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Neighbourhoods of Bareilly
Template:Neighbourhoods of Bareilly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pichpich (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
StevenJ81 (talk)

AZ Research Partners Pvt. Ltd.
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.


 * As I said above, the article on AZ Research Partners Pvt. Ltd was deleted because it was promotional in tone. Please read our neutral point of view policy before writing any further articles.  It is not true that it contained "many references from the top newspapers of India".  It contained only four references in total, only one of which was to a newspaper and that was to an advertisement and contained no independent comment on the company.Deb (talk) 07:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

List of Hindu temples in Bareilly
Hi, please come back and explain what you wrote in List of Hindu temples in Bareilly. The article also needs citations from reliable sources. – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, perhaps you just copied it out of the article Bareilly. Even if it wasn't you that wrote it, can you explain it, as you seem to know a lot about Bareilly? – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fun City Boond Amusement and Water Park


The article Fun City Boond Amusement and Water Park has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can't find any independent third-party sources at all. There are a lot of google hits to the park's own pages, facebook, etc, also to sites like http://placeandsee.com/s?as=lugares&n=fun-city-boond-amusement-and-water-park&i=3 and http://www.triposo.com/poi/T__bd86a2a4623e. These are user-created: prominent links to forms for uploading content demonstrates that anybody can do so. That means it's advertising and self-description.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Hindu temples in Bareilly


The article List of Hindu temples in Bareilly has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Hindu temples would be plenty in an Indian city/town. A "list of Hindu temples in [Indian town]" should hence only include blue link entries that are notable. This list fails that and also fails WP:V.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Hindu temples in Bareilly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Hindu temples in Bareilly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Hindu temples in Bareilly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Azad Kashmir seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of tourist attractions in Bareilly


The article List of tourist attractions in Bareilly has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL and fully unreferenced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 08:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)