User talk:Sunflowermalta

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Setcom has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv9qijwbok0). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:S-core..JPG
Thanks for uploading File:S-core..JPG I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.56.218 (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Now all images have correct licensing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LTE_Layers.jpg).

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Setcom, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from CouchSurfing. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Setcom. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''There are multiple other issues with your edit. Please discuss at the talk page.'' Muhandes (talk) 15:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Promotion
After reading the text you added again, I realize how promotional it is. Sentences like "As an active member in virtually all the wireless testing international regulatory boards, setcom is well positioned to create new and innovative test solutions for the rapidly advancing telecommunications market" are unacceptable. Are you in any way related with setcom? --Muhandes (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

I try to learn how to be editor but it seems all I do is wrong. I found many articles of one subject and I try to make the proper page. I will place citations, I already started last week and made 5 or 6, hope it was the right thing.

I would like to edit more pages of wireless technology but until I learn the proper way I wont dare.

I saw that setcom employees liked my articles and added many hings which were removed after. I was not composing, I was copying-pasting from different sources and did not see the line between promotion and information.

I will look into it, and add citations where I took the information from.

Thanks for your corrections! sunflowermalta (talk) 10:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * In general, copy pasting is a bad idea for two reasons. First, it risks copyright violation. The proper thing to do is read all the relevant sources, ingest the material, and write it completely in your own words, citing the relevant sources. Second, if the source is primary it may be promotional and lacking a neutral point of view. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)