User talk:Sunfox1

Welcome!

 * }

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ted Morton has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yGAmUQX904&feature=related. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Ted Morton
Hello. You have added a separate "Criticism" section to the Ted Morton article several times. WP:CRIT suggests that it is better to integrate criticism with the rest of the article rather than separating it out into an isolated section where possible, which has largely been done to this article. Similarly, a section ostensibly one Morton's accomplishments was removed, in exchange for a more neutral description of his actions as a politician. If you think a Criticism section here is warranted, please respond on the article's talk page as to why.--Trystan (talk) 17:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Referencing the lead section
Just as an FYI, inline references are not required in the lead if the same statements are referenced in the article body. At Wildrose Party, every statement you marked is cited in the body proper. As such, I undid your cn tags at the same time I undid an IP editor's POV-laden edits. Cheers, Resolute 16:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

3RR
The following is the standard warning for 3RR (edit warring). Although I am placing this warning on your talk page, my initial investigation shows that you may simply be undoing vandalism on Gordon Dirks. I do encourage you to read the warning, but you may wish to remove it from this page after doing so if you are sure what you were doing is reverting vandalism. Either way, I urge you to refrain from any further editing for a while. If the content removal from the other user continues, I'll bring it up on the admin noticeboard. --Yamla (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.