User talk:Sunilastin

Welcome!
Hello, Sunilastin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Unspecified source/license for File:Qualiteracy Knowledge Flow.png
Thanks for uploading File:Qualiteracy Knowledge Flow.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Qualiteracyjpg.jpg
OK no problem buddy I am just not sure about the contents types that can be uploaded to Wikipedia but promotion was not my intention at all. I just thought that it might be a record of some information for all. Anyways...

I am thankful for those who provide space for people to share and distribute their Ideas just for the betterment of mankind and humanity.

Proposed deletion of Khanduva


The article Khanduva has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject is non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Kindly don't delete any changes, I am working to add more references to this page.

Speedy deletion nomination of CyberSipahi
Hello Sunilastin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CyberSipahi for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Enwebb (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.  Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, Facebook, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company organisation  claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references at all.  Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * There is nothing to show how this organisation meets the notability criteria I've linked above. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits funding or expenditure, but your article gives us no real facts, appears to be just a WhatsApp group with no verifiable membership.
 * the only external link you should give is the organisation's main web site, not Youtube or anything else
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: a man with a vision and strong morals... actively having an eye on almost all the published news... always prompt and steady in analyzing the rumors, hoaxes and current affairs... committed to deliver, genuine and unbiased news...&mdash; and on and on. Just fact-free spam.
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from the organisations web site. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * The images are clearly copyright violations with fake claims that they are your own work. One is the organisation's logo, another is a screenshot of a copyright programme, neither of which you are likely to own the copyright to
 * Even your request on my talk page amounted to spam eg it is fulfilling the blood requirement for Indian army soldiers and their family and for the needy ones too... CyberSipahi is also fighting against paid and biased media. It’s fighting against corruption and conspiracies too..
 * If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)