User talk:Sunlight123

Proposed deletion of Aaronia
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aaronia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Can't see any real indication of notability. The only links to independent coverage mention some company called "Kaltman", not "Aaronia"; if this is the same company, the connection isn't explained.  Other than that, can't find any non-trivial coverage via Google.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oli Filth(talk 22:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaronia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaronia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaronia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your apparent conflict of interest
Please be welcome and read: Plain and simple conflict of interest guide

Happy editing.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh, by "units" I see you likely mean "devices". I thought you meant some sort of business divisions. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Thats a good one :-) Would be happy to...

Orphaned non-free image File:Aaronia.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Aaronia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Microwave Direction Finding
Hi, I've only recently noticed that you deleted the section on Microwave Direction Finding from Direction finding in September last year. Why did you do that? Thanks D1ofBerks (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Direction finding
This edit is extremely problematic for two reasons. Firstly it restores an image that had previously been removed by another editor without first attempting to discuss the issue (WP:EW). Secondly, you appear to have reinstated the image by editing an old version of the page. Doing that stupidly removed 28 kbytes of other material that is now going to be very difficult to restore because there have now been a year's worth of intervening edits over the top of it. SpinningSpark 18:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)