User talk:SunnieBG

License tagging for Image:First radio presenters.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:First radio presenters.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 13:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:First radio presenters.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:First radio presenters.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 00:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Studio one.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Studio one.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 19:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sofia by night.jpg
Здрасти, ти не си авторът на снимката, взел си я от http://www.grandhotelsofia.bg/. Моля те, недей в бъдеще да качваш чужди творби и да ги представяш за твои — в Уикипедия авторското право е от особено значение, затова се позволяват само снимки със свободен лиценз, а тази не е такава. Иначе оценявам, че се опитваш да помогнеш, но това не е начинът. Поздрави, Todor→Bozhinov 21:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Horizon Radio
Please read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. And if you've got a problem with me for some reason, feel free to discuss it with me civilly. I'm sorry if my comment has offended you or irritated you, it wasn't intended to do so, and "the guy" isn't an insult in my opinion. As for the copied History section, this is absolutely true and I don't see anything wrong with just noting it, especially when you're claiming the content is "original". Regards, Todor→Bozhinov 21:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Wildfiresz.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Wildfiresz.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Wildfiresz.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Wildfiresz.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Weather
Hello, I wanted to thank you for contributing to the Weather in 2007 article. I have been most active in keeping it up to date so I appreciate any help. Your contributions are welcome in the future as well, so if you're interested about global weather, please don't hesitate to contribute to the article! I can see that you have greatly contributed to the article about the 2007 Bulgarian Heat wave, and I thank you for linking to it in the global weather article. I just restored the main-tag linking to 2007 European heat wave that you had removed because it's the main article about that subject, even if it's a stub at the moment. Be hearing from you! Oghmoir 20:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Image:Jetstreamsummer2007.gif
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Jetstreamsummer2007.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Jetstreamsummer2007.gif is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Jetstreamsummer2007.gif, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bnr logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Bnr logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Oculotect
A tag has been placed on Oculotect, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Oculotect
I have nominated Oculotect, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Oculotect. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Chimney sofia.jpg
File:Chimney sofia.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Chimney sofia.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for personal attacks, as and edit warring, as . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Firestarazagora.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Firestarazagora.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jetstreamovereurope2007.gif
A tag has been placed on File:Jetstreamovereurope2007.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring on ogrish.com to add a spam link over a period of months, and repeatedly uploading copyrighted images while claiming to be the owner and "releasing" them into the public domain. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)