User talk:Sunny222

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 15:27, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nathan2055talk-review 18:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malik safdar ali awan


The article Malik safdar ali awan has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Malik safdar ali awan has been reverted. Your edit here to Malik safdar ali awan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiIXz6hnZgs&feature=related/, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw9FXMuOVVg/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Malik safdar ali awan. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. DoDo Bird Brain (talk) 19:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Malik safdar ali awan. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. DoDo Bird Brain (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Malik safdar ali awan


A tag has been placed on Malik safdar ali awan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DoDo Bird Brain (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Malik safdar ali awan do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Your edit here to Malik safdar ali awan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiIXz6hnZgs, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw9FXMuOVVg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Malik safdar ali awan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Millahnna (talk) 21:47, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Malik safdar ali awan. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Your edit here to Malik safdar ali awan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiIXz6hnZgs, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw9FXMuOVVg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please listen
Okay, you've gotten a lot of generic, templated messages above. Let me try to give you a personal explanation of what's been going on. First, you tried several times to have your article created via Articles for creation, and each time you were turned down. It's a little disappointing that, after that, you went ahead and made the article anyway once you became a confirmed editor. But anyway, you did create the article, and it was soon nominated for speedy deletion. As an admin, I have declined that speedy deletion, because I think that the article makes a "claim of significance or importance," which is all an article about a person has to do to survive speedy deletion. However, I do not believe that the article meets our notability guidelines for people, so I have instead switched the article to what is called a "Prod". The Prod lasts 7 days; at any time in that seven days, you or anyone else may remove the prod if you think the article does meet the guidelines. Of course, if that is done without actually improving the article, then I'll take it to a Articles for Deletion discussion; in that case, the community will be asked to give input as to whether or not the subject is notable enough, and that decision will be (basically) final.

So, if you want the article to be kept, you need to add more references. However, that brings us to the issue of Youtube and the message you left on User:Katarighe's talk page. You asked how you can add in information that you know personally. The answer is that you cannot. Wikipedia requires that all information come from reliable sources--that means newspapers, academic journals, reputable books, etc. Youtube videos, your personal knowledge, and blogs or other self-published websites do not count as reliable. If there are no more reliable sources that have discussed Awan in detail, then it is likely that xe cannot have an article in Wikipedia. Additionally, please do not add links to Youtube. In general, youtube is not a reliable source, with very small exceptions for "official" channels of news stations or other similar sources; any other youtube link will generally be deleted automatically (we even have an automated bot that does it for us).

If you have any questions about these processes or Wikipedia in general, please come to my talk page and ask--I am glad to help. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

New references
Do the new references you added actualy talk about Malik Safdar Ali Awan? Or are they talking in general about Islam, the Awan clan, etc.? Qwyrxian (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Malik Safdar Ali Awan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik Safdar Ali Awan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malik Safdar Ali Awan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nathan2055talk-review 22:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)