User talk:Sunnybondsinghjalwehra

thanks thanksSunnybondsinghjalwehra 12:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyrighted text
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we CANNOT accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material.

As a consequence, your article will most likely be deleted; in fact, it may already have been deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text - which means allowing other people to modify it - then you have to prove that it's yours (because people can and do lie) by adding, on the external site, the statement that "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. - Lucky 6.9 17:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Notability of Manjot Singh
A tag has been placed on Manjot Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

---

oh ok

thanks man

Sunnybondsinghjalwehra 17:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

welcome to Wikiproject India
 Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the India WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every India article in Wikipedia.
 * Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! -- Lost (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

HEYYY thanksSunnybondsinghjalwehra 12:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Stub creation
Hi there, and welcome! I see that you're active in the India WikiProjects. May I suggest that before you create a "stub" category, you propose it at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals before plunging in? The has some problems, in that there aren't really enough articles to justify a stub type (usually at least 60 articles should qualify), plus there are naming conventions to be applied. I don't want to discourage you, so please have a look at the proposals page and use it if you want stub types created. Cheers! Pegship 00:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[[Image:Flag_of_India.svg|28px]] WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume 1, Issue 2 - November 2006
i read all this, thx for calling me a contributious editer... Sunnybondsinghjalwehra 16:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Article for Deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sikhs_in_Belgium, has been listed at Articles for deletion/Sikhs_in_Belgium. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Qwertyca 02:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD Removed
User:CanadianCaesar has extensively re-written your article on Sikhs_in_Belgium and brought it up to par for a Wikipedia stub. As a result, I will request an admin to remove it from AfD. Thanks. --Qwertyca 05:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Romuz Uddin
I have added a "" template to the article Romuz Uddin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Joe Decker 23:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Sant.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sant.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Jalwehrain1987.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwehrain1987.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalwehrain87.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwehrain87.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalwehrareceivingsiropa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwehrareceivingsiropa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:0EB4EE75.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:0EB4EE75.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Seraphim Whipp 13:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Shaheed Manjeet Singh Babbar
A template has been added to the article Shaheed Manjeet Singh Babbar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. B. Wolterding 17:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:ActorShivendraMahal.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ActorShivendraMahal.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 13:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Koom Singh Doad
A tag has been placed on Koom Singh Doad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chris DHDR 21:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Sukhdev Ahluwalia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sukhdev Ahluwalia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Non-commercial image
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:PresidentofkhalistanGurmitsinghaulakh.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for Image:Jagjit singh chauhan.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jagjit singh chauhan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Gurmit singh aulakh.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gurmit singh aulakh.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of President of Khalistan
An article that you have been involved in editing, President of Khalistan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

bolowali encounter
Sir, could u please explain me why u put an notice on the article Bolowali Encounter? COuld u tell me what I can do, to improve it. Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 14:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, the article on Bolowali Encounter does not have any verifiable reference and on googling it one gets only 3 hits out of which two are from wikipedia and the other is an extremist pov blog, thus it seems that the article is based on original research WP:OR. I would like to suggest that in order to keep the article you have to get verifiable npov sources to substantiate the claims made in the article. LegalEagle (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Proposed Map of Khalistan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Proposed Map of Khalistan.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

hi
Hi how are you 123.201.45.80 (talk) 08:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

hi i'm fine how ru? ur sikh?? Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Moujiya Encounter: BKI against Indian Armed Forces
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LegalEagle (talk) 11:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Mistake in categorising as attack, I was using TW and instead of Original research i had inadvertently opted for attack, however if you look into the article you would find that the attack tag has been replaced with other tag. LegalEagle (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Sunny
God bless U, If you can read/ translate or know Hindi & ..... if you are helpful .....or say... If you are familiar with some cities states of India, I need your help. That will be great if your good self will  guide me about some newspapers, their authenticity , circulation , reading status, popularity etc   in your  North Indian states like: Jammu Kashmir , Punjab , Rajasthan , Uttar Pradesh , Haryana etc. I want to now about newspapers like -   Punjab Kesari , (Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh ) Dainik Bhaskar ( Rajasthan , Gujarat etc)  Rajasthan Patrika, Evening Post (Jaipur}, Samachar Jagat(Udaipur),  Aparan Times (Udaipur), Mahka Bharat (Jaipur) , Nav jyoti (Jaipur) If you can help me out please come on my talk page .--Dralansun (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Regards - Alan Sun

Khalistan movement
Hi, I have been paying attention to your edits on the article and I actually think that you have been doing a good job. My intent was to remove the weasel words and POV inserted by an anonymous IP (not you). I would appreciate it, however, if you didn't call my edits POV because of me being a Hindu. Thanks! -- vi5in [talk] 17:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem :) Happy editing! -- vi5in [talk] 22:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Sunny, the khalistan and Sikh movement articles are again being vandalised with extreme Indian POV, suggeste you and other Wiki editors push for protection

Can the Khalistan pages be protected they are vandalised everyday, also other Sikh pages seem to be under attack.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 07:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Brother Sunny, the Khalistan related pages are mostly attacked, if you click on the IP address of the Indian extremists the changes come up. Eeven the 'Sikh' page was up until recently had a focus towards showing a lot of Sikhs with cut hair, subtle but you know what is going on. Can the Khalistan pages be protected, a file sent to higher administrators about what is going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 07:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Gurmit Singh Aulakhs page is also attacked, you can get a trial of all the changes when you click on their IP address. Are there a group of Sikh editors, the Indian ones all oppose Sikh views mostly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 10:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Indo-Khalistan wars
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Indo-Khalistan wars, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Sunny, the khalistan and Sikh movement articles are again being vandalised with extreme Indian POV, suggeste you and other Wiki editors push for protection —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 07:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you file a 3RR report against some of the people making changes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 09:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Shere Punjab
The article Shere Punjab has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See WP:V -- you need sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Sukhdev Singh Jalwerha
Hi there. I've nominated the above article for deletion. Since you created it, your opinions and input into the discussion are welcome. You can chime in here. I would suggest that you bring sources and other ways to back up the claims of notability in the article, if you can the chances of a keep are much higher. Thanks! --UsaSatsui (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:JagtarSinghHawara.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JagtarSinghHawara.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Paramjit Singh Ajrawat
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paramjit Singh Ajrawat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Paramjit Singh Ajrawat. LegalEagle (talk) 16:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Gotras of Rajputs
A tag has been placed on Template:Gotras of Rajputs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello Sunny! Bond?
I have removed the war tag of Khalistan Indo wars from Operation Blue Star. As you might not know that Bhindranwale was fighting for greater rights for Punjab. He is known for raising voice for his religion and Khalistan does not seem to be expicitly in his agenda. It is a very comlicated matter ( i mean his views on Khalistan ). Operation blue Star has nothing to do with Khalistan ( Trust Me ). If you wan to discuus or reply, do it here.Ajjay (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You are right. But he meant that the attack on Golden Temple would convince the sikhs that there is no use of living in a country which wants to destroy them. The concept of Khalistan would come if Sikhs had no place in India. Before operation blue star, he was not an explicit demanding Khalistan, he was raising his voice for other reasons, such as greater freedom etc.Ajjay (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Mehnga Singh Babbar
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mehnga Singh Babbar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Mehnga Singh Babbar. LegalEagle (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikiquette alerts
Hello, you have been reported to the wikiquette noticeboard for what seems to be a serious breach of civility rules. Considering all the circumstances of the case that I can see, I would say that that was probably the correct place (rather than WP:ANI where they easily block users). While leaving a message on another user's user page, starting with "u idiot", is of course never OK, I am aware that the translation of the rest of your comment may have been an April fools' joke. In any case I would appreciate your comment at WP:WQA. --Hans Adler (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sukhdev Singh Babbar
Please save article Sukhdev Singh Babbar from deletion by voting at Vote if you beleive that he was a notable person. Singh6 (talk) 15:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Navneet Singh Khadian
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Navneet Singh Khadian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Extremely Urgent - IHRO
Please give your vote at RSN if you beleive that Human Rights Watchdog is a unbiased organization.

Please remember that huge number of crimes committed by Indian security forces in Punjab will go un-referenced on wikipedia if www.ihro.in is declared POV site. Reason this is among extremely few unbiased sources available online. Eventhough some of the north-Indian newspapers always published govt crimes in Punjab, but unfortunately they do not have this old data archived. For example, The Tribune (a 125 year old newspaper group), one of north-Indian newspapers does not have any online editions prior to year 2001 and Ajit, a regional newspaper of India etc did not have any online editions untill very recently. Also, India’s National magazine, Frontline does not have archive records prior to 1997.

Please read "Amnesty International", "Amnesty International, "Human Rights watch" where it says that "Thousands of mothers await their sons even though some may know that that the oppressor has not spared their sons’ lives on this earth. A mother’s heart is such that even if she sees her son’s dead body, she does not accept that her son has left her. And those mothers who have not even seen their children’s dead bodies, they were asking us: at least find out, is our son alive or not?" and "ENSAAF". As per HRW, Indian security forces arbitrarily detained, tortured, executed, and “disappeared” tens of thousands of Sikhs in counterinsurgency operations. Please remember, Amnesty International was not allowed to enter Punjab during these troubled times, hence Amnesty can not provide records of most of the crimes committed by Indian security forces as an India based Organization IHRO.

So please vote at RSN ASAP .Singh6 (talk) 07:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Navneet Singh Khadian
An article that you have been involved in editing, Navneet Singh Khadian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Navneet Singh Khadian. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? UtherSRG (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Proposed_Map_of_Khalistan.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Proposed_Map_of_Khalistan.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sikh extremism
An article recently created on Sikhs, i.e. Sikh extremism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Sikh extremism. Remember! your vote is very important Thank you. Singh6 (talk) 08:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Cover ChadiJawaniBudheNu.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Cover ChadiJawaniBudheNu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Cover ChadiJawaniBudheNu.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Cover ChadiJawaniBudheNu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Cover ChadiJawaniBudheNu.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Cover ChadiJawaniBudheNu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem
Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.


 * File:Cover KunwaraJeeja.jpg
 * File:Cover ZakhmiDil.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Manjot3.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Manjot3.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 17:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Manjot-receiving-filmfare-award.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Manjot-receiving-filmfare-award.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 13:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Manjot1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Manjot1.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 10:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Unreleased/Shelved Punjwood films
I have nominated Unreleased/Shelved Punjwood films, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Unreleased/Shelved Punjwood films. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Radiant chains (talk) 14:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Shashi Puri
A tag has been placed on Shashi Puri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sukhwinder Singh Sangha
A tag has been placed on Sukhwinder Singh Sangha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DarkAudit (talk) 22:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Peshwar under Maharaja Ranjit Singh/Sikh rule
I have posted this note even on sikh portal, but trying to find some active sikh wikipedians to take note of this issue pls! Hi, I was going through the article Peshawar, and it portrays Maharaja Ranjit Singh & Sikh rule in bad light, that he was a tyrannical ruler who broke all mosques & made them gurdwaras, and that the city was plundered/declined under Sikh rule! I was pretty surprised, I also noticed that the article has not been categorized under the list of sikh places, nor has Bala Hisar Fort... so i categorized them as places of importance in sikhhism, and I request any sikh history expert to go through those two articles, I found it pretty biased, it only speaks of the pashtun heritage and ignores the existence of sikh population, as though only the rulers were tyrannical sikhs! perhaps Ranjit Singhji did break down some mosques, but we need some background/justification behind it instead of portraying him as a religious bigot! but I dont have the requisite knowledge to make changes in the article! Also, please re-categorize them under some other category in case mine was not right! Thanks! Lilaac (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply, I would request you to contact some other expert in case you're not good at it, I dont think this issue should be ignored... History should never be a one way bias, the article doesnt mention hindu/sikh heritage, I am sure Ranjit Singh would have had a reason behind any so called mosque demolition, history knows what was done to the Sikh Gurus under mughal rule,and Peshawar was always a bustling hindu+sikh place before it got invaded by afghan pakhtuns under Nadir Shah etc. I think the main reason this article is so biased, it is only part of the Pakistan categories, and has only their perspective, they wont know how it was pre-partition before sikhs+hindus were driven out. Lilaac (talk) 21:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, you seem to have really done a lot o researching on this article, am glad! I have one suggestion though, could you post your last post to me on the talk page of peshawar, i think all those points should go there under a heading of "Decline under sikh rule?", because this shouldnt be a private correspondence between us anymore, more sikhs might look into that article now that you have brought up the issue,and everyone should be able to discuss it on the article talk page! thanks, and I hope we see some improvements in that article and get rid of its biased made up references! Lilaac (talk) 19:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 1 – June 2009
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 11:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Labh Singh
At Labh Singh, you made this edit. Unfortunately it removed the copyvio flag from the last paragraph without addressing it. I have deleted the paragraph yet again. Please do not restore it without correcting the copyright issue. Removal of flags without correcting the issue is to be avoided. :)- sinneed (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

On my talk page, you wrote: Thats fine, but stop editing those articles like ur doing now, make JUST ONE EDIt, u keep editing all the time for each small mistake and at a given time we can't follow the edits anymore. Try to do your edits in just one or fewer times than the hundred times ur doing. If you don't mind to which part of the world do u belong? [[User:Sunnybondsinghjalwehra|Sunnybondsinghjalwehra]] ([[User talk:Sunnybondsinghjalwehra|talk]]) 21:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC) - sinneed (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * "Thats fine," - what?
 * "but stop editing those articles like ur doing now, make JUST ONE EDIt" - absolutely not.
 * "u keep editing all the time for each small mistake" - The articles are old. If you are interested, you have had plenty of time to fix them.  Please feel free to join in.  Making small edits is a good thing.  Each has an edit summary explaining it.
 * " and at a given time we can't follow the edits anymore" - Each has an edit summary explaining it. If you have a question or comment, that is what the appropriate wp:talk page or wp:edit summary (edit to add) on a correcting edit or wp:COMMENT is for.  Also, of course, one may simply flag something, and most of the flag wp:templates have comment fields. Clearly *no one* is having problems following the edits, as no questions are being made, and no comments that stray far from abuse.

Use of overfamiliar language.
Please do not address me as "bro". Such a diminutive is insulting to me.- sinneed (talk) 16:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * "If you don't mind to which part of the world do u belong?" -- STOP NOW! Your approach is very very wrong.  Do not do this again.  Remove your focus from me entirely.  Your fascination with me is disturbing and inappropriate.- sinneed (talk) 21:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. inappropriate Stop now. - sinneed (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 15:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Sunnybondsinghjalwehra! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Gugu Gill -
 * 2) Sukhdev Ahluwalia -
 * 3) Satish Kaul -
 * 4) Shashi Puri -

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  Tinu  Cherian BOT  - 02:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

& (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_requests&oldid=481419438#Message_to_take_part_in_Assessment_Drive request] on Bot requests. The Helpful  Bot  01:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of actions by Babbar Khalsa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of actions by Babbar Khalsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of actions by Babbar Khalsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jethwarp (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khalistan Armed Force


The article Khalistan Armed Force has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Khalistan Armed Force – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 18:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Sikhism by each indian state in 2001.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sikhism by each indian state in 2001.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jagjit singh chauhan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jagjit singh chauhan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:SukhdevJalwehrain1989.jpg


The file File:SukhdevJalwehrain1989.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jatt Jeona Mour (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jatt Jeona Mour (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jatt Jeona Mour (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heba Aisha (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dharam Jeet


The article Dharam Jeet has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability, no reviews found"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  22:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)