User talk:Sunnytan1

December 2015
Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Administrative liability in English Law— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Ete ethan  (talk)  19:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Administrative liability in English Law. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Administrative liability in English Law was changed by Sunnytan1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852954 on 2015-12-10T20:02:39+00:00.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Spencer T♦ C 21:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)