User talk:Sunset-LA

Wikipedia is not a form of advertising. Please see WP:COI.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, N9NE Group, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  &#xE01E;&#xE01E;&#xE01E; Iunaw  &#xE441;  21:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Ghostbar Las Vegas
A tag has been placed on Ghostbar Las Vegas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Ghostbar Las Vegas and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  &#xE01E;&#xE01E;&#xE01E; Iunaw  &#xE441;  21:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!  &#xE01E;&#xE01E;&#xE01E; Iunaw  &#xE441;  21:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Notability of MOON Nightclub
A tag has been placed on MOON Nightclub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  &#xE01E;&#xE01E;&#xE01E; Iunaw  &#xE441;  21:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Nove Italiano
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nove Italiano, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nove Italiano is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nove Italiano, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ghostbar
A tag has been placed on Ghostbar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KevinCuddeback (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I tried creating pages for these nightclubs and restaurant using only information cited from media sources. I removed adjectives that described the spaces in a positive light (words such as "amazing" and "spectacular") so the descriptions would be completely factual - such as the square footage, number of bars, color scheme, etc. Why is this still considered advertising? Please refer to the page for The Playboy Club (Las Vegas). I added some information to that page, citing the same source I tried to create these other pages, and that hasn't been flagged.
 * Based on your user name it seems that you probably have a conflict of interest. Without seeing the articles it is hard to tell for sure but admins usually only delete blatant advertising. The article should concentrate on the notability of the subject not on the layout and other details about the space. Try writing an article on one of them here: User:N9NE Group/sandbox and asking for an editor to review it on the WP:Help desk. Please also read WP:FAQ/Business.  Gtstricky Talk or C 21:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I have made some modifications to the MOON article at your sandbox. Your username has been blocked as a violation of username policy, but you can still indicate whether you'd like this article to be created by replying here or e-mailing me. haz  (talk) 21:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I would still like this article created. For future editing I will stick with the sandbox and seek approval from editors. Thank you! N9NE Group (talk) 22:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Business' FAQ and Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text  or emailing the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.

OK I can create a new username and I am sorry I've had such trouble creating new articles. The advice on creating articles in a sandbox and then submitting for approval was very helpful, and had someone advised me on that earlier I would have done it so I wouldn't have violated the rules so many times. I also wasn't aware that just listing factual information in an article is not wikipedia's goal, and now understand articles are meant to be on NOTABLE subjects.
 * It looks like most of your edits so far have been related to your own business. Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree not to write about ourselves or our businesses.  Now that you know that you won't be writing about your business at all, do you still want an account?  What other kinds of useful edits do you think you'll be doing? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * COI guidelines don't prohibit editing such articles.. They just warn about the possible issues that might come up. This guy also doesn't have to justify what other edits he may or may not make. We don't say "oh, I don't think you'll be very helpful, so we'll just keep you blocked". That's not for us to decide. Allow him to edit again and then we'll see where things go. -- Ned Scott 23:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia also isn't for advertising, however, and there isn't much point in unblocking someone who's just going to be reblocked a short time later for violating policy. Making a check like this saves everyone a lot of time and frustration in the long run, just in case it is the only reason they're here - which has happened plenty of times before. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand that, but the only thing this user should need to do to be unblocked is (besides a name change request) show that they have a better understanding of what not to do, and to try to do better next time. -- Ned Scott 06:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Er... yes. that's why I asked the question.  To find out whether she has a better understanding of what not to do, and is going to refrain from doing it again.  I didn't say I wouldn't unblock; we're just waiting for the answer to the question I asked.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, my bad. -- Ned Scott 23:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

As I said, I now understand that listing facts does not qualify as warranting a wikipedia page. I read the guidelines on notability and I get it. And though I can't give you a list of all the articles I plan on contributing to, I think it's harsh to block me INDEFINITELY. Not all of the edits I've made have been violations; I've corrected some outdated information for example. N9NE Group (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I tried following that link though, and then when I tried to submit my request it told me I am still blocked.
 * That's funny, you don't look blocked (not on blocklist, unblock duly logged). All I can think of is bypassing your cache, making sure you're logged in, and trying again. Algebraist 21:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I cleared my cache, logged out and logged back in but it's still not working. When I try to follow that link, it pops up that I am blocked indefinitely, but below that there is a stamp that says the block is set to expire at _____ and it's always the current time. I think it's odd that I'm blocked because of my username, but I can't change it because I'm blocked.N9NE Group (talk) 22:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Try unblock-auto ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 22:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)