User talk:Sunuraju

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Howdoesitgo1 (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Rough and Tough
Do you in which year was Kannada film Rough and Tough released?PhysicsScientist (talk) 07:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Rough and Tough
I want year of release of Rough and Tough.PhysicsScientist (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Vegetarian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nairspecht  Converse  14:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Even if English is not your first language, I appreciate your work in Asian cinema articles. Keep trying.

Sro23 (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 

Reference errors on 8 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * On the W (TV series) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=728903856 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F728903856%7CW (TV series)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Category:Revenge anime and manga has been nominated for discussion
Category:Revenge anime and manga, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 21st Busan International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last Princess. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Why did you move Justin Lee (criminal)
Hello. You just moved Justin Lee (criminal) to Justin Lee sex scandal. Why did you do that? There is a discussion ongoing. Please revert the move. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I see that you have reverted the move. Thank you so much! --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Request to add sources
Please see this discussion. In my closure of this discussion I explained the need to add sources that certain anime or manga contain a revenge theme. Since you are the creator of Category:Revenge anime and manga and have added all of the articles to it, I ask this from you. Please make sure to add only anime or manga in which revenge is a dominant theme to this category, and please add a source when you do so. Please also add sources to the articles that remain in the category, if you can, otherwise the category can be removed from them. Debresser (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

You are hereby warned, that if you continue to add contested and unsourced categories to articles, you risk you edit privileges being restricted. Debresser (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kanojo wa Uso o Aishisugiteru, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. '' What is the point of just dumping bare URL links to sources, when you are not adding any content?? For example here. 220  of '' Borg 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mystery Queen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Choi Kang-hee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bombay Dada
Hello Sunuraju,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bombay Dada for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark Dask  22:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Song Joong-ki
Hi. Is it really necessary to add 5 references that all say the same thing just to support one sentence? What you're doing is citation overkill. Moreover, the excessive citations you are adding are bare urls, at least fill in the citations if you're going to add them. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:59, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Sunuraju, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3ASunuraju added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Spacecowboy420. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Kim Ki-duk have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Nonsense English
Sorry, but I don't think your English is good enough to contribute towards English language wikipedia.

"Kim Jee-woon will live action remake titled In-Rang will stars Kang Dong-won, Jung Woo-sung and Han Hyo-joo in leading roles" is full of mistakes.

Perhaps you could consider contributing towards a different wikipedia in your native language? That might be easier for you. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Review Your Article
Hi ,

I have nomination your article for GA. You are invited in Talk:My Love from the Star/GA1. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001   (TALK)    04:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Citing
Please properly cite your source. Don't just add the link. You can use this Template:Cite news or you can activate RefToolbar by going here Gadgets and selecting refToolbar. CherryPie94 &#x1F352;&#x1f967; (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for heads up
Hi Sunu, you picked the best of the citations between The Korea Herald and The Korea Times. I will add some info. about Kangin later, but looks like he is not involved. Thanks! have fun editing!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson
Hello, thanks for editing on Wikipedia. I undid your revision to the article Robert Pattinson, due to the fact that he is not confirmed as Batman and is merely on a short list of actors that Matt Reeves wants to play the Dark Knight. Please refrain from adding this revision until he has been officially confirmed. Thanks again.  GrendelNightmares  (talk) 04:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Globe Award for Best Actor – Television Series Drama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Cox ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Golden_Globe_Award_for_Best_Actor_%E2%80%93_Television_Series_Drama check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Golden_Globe_Award_for_Best_Actor_%E2%80%93_Television_Series_Drama?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Miss International 2020. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ''Please provide RS if you wish to add new details on venue/location of the competition. Thanks.'' Migsmigss (talk) 06:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Non-free content use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Miss Universe Philippines 2020, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Aaryan33056. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Ansel Elgort have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. '' Allegations, unconfirmed, we don't do rumors. References to them are irrelevant at this time. Aaryan'' 📬 • 🥰 04:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nakshathrakoodaram


The article Nakshathrakoodaram has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, only things found during a WP:BEFORE is links to soundtrack for film, and online film databases. No independent reviews found."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sunil Vayassu 20 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunil Vayassu 20 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sunil Vayassu 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sreedharante Onnam Thirumurivu


The article Sreedharante Onnam Thirumurivu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search except film database sites and youtube videos. Tagged for notability for 9 years."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devasura


The article Devasura has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, tagged since 2010. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lament (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lament (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lament (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Man Standing Next


Hello, Sunuraju. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Man Standing Next".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop posting bare URLs as references
I have just looked through your 20 most recent edits to Wikipedia, the ones you have made in December. 12 of these edits were additions such as this one of a bare, unexplained URL in reference tags. Looking back further at random edits from your contributions history, it looks like the majority of your edits for at least several months have been of this kind. A URL is not a source, and on its own it does not tell the reader anything about what the actual source is. The citation/reference must include information about the title, author, publication, and date (at least), and those things are more important than the URL. A new editor is given a lot of latitude in things like this, but you have been around for years, and other editors have asked you before to cite the sources properly, for instance in 2016, 2017, and 2018 (with some advice on good tools to use).

Please stop doing this. If you want help with citing sources properly, ask at the Teahouse or Help desk. Also do consider whether a short sentence that already has a source really needs several more sources stating the same thing (e.g. 1, 2). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 12:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Despite repeated requests to stop adding bare URLs as references, you have continued doing it. These edits were made after my post above:, ,. bonadea contributions talk 09:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

reFill
Have you considered trying the reFill tool? All you have to do is paste the title of the article into https://refill.toolforge.org/ and it fills the bare refs for you. I've used it before and it's very easy. Sro23 (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Thalastaanam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thalastaanam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thalastaanam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mood of the Day


The article Mood of the Day has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bombay Dada


The article Bombay Dada has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Praja


The article Praja has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anuragada Alegalu


The article Anuragada Alegalu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greetings (2004 film)


The article Greetings (2004 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Praja for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Praja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Praja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hariharan Pillai Happy Aanu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hariharan Pillai Happy Aanu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hariharan Pillai Happy Aanu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum


The article Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Globe Award for Best Foreign Language Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Could you please elaborate on your removal please?!?
Hello, since you didn't give your explanation in the edit summary on the constant removal 12 of the supposed drama Sarang from the "See also" parameter of the TV infobox for Rina, could you please explain to me by replying to this section on what justifies your decisions? Then I wouldn't have to keep reverting, which puts my account at risk of being blocked. —'''[[User:Beetricks| bee tricks ]]''' ~ 💬 · ✉️ 16:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Churam


The article Churam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Onnaman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onnaman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Onnaman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021


A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meerayude Dukhavum Muthuvinte Swapnavum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Vellinakshatram (2004 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vellinakshatram (2004 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vellinakshatram (2004 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Citation
On December 7, 2019, you added a citation in the article on Ian Ziering. In adding the citation, you provided only a website link. Please research the proper manner in which citations are written and follow that style. I corrected the one in question and was happy to do so. God bless and happy editing! MarydaleEd (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kang Hye-won


A tag has been placed on Kang Hye-won requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

"Kang Hye-won" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kang Hye-won. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Category:Chinese film remakes has been nominated for discussion
Category:Chinese film remakes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thirumanassu


The article Thirumanassu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "article does not provide any reference of being a notable film"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gruhapravesha


The article Gruhapravesha has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "fails WP:NFILM. no reliable sources found."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chitrashalabham


The article Chitrashalabham has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "fails WP:NFILM. no reliable sources found."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Darshan (2004 film)


The article Darshan (2004 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No reliable sources/reviews. Article depends on one unreliable source per WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 01:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Darshan (2004 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darshan (2004 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chakkaramuthu


The article Chakkaramuthu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  12:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Johnny Kitagawa
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Johnny Kitagawa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Sunuraju&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1169278064 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnny_Kitagawa&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1169278064%7CJohnny%20Kitagawa%5D%5D Ask for help])

October 2023
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Pacto de sangre (Mexican TV series), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Skipple. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nancy Mace, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  - Skipple  ☎  14:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to The Zone of Interest (film), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. ''Hi, just wanted to let you know that you broke the table formatting in The Zone of Interest (film) by improperly inserting a (mostly empty) row. Please check that before publishing edits and ideally please also add rows fully and properly not just as an unfinished placeholder.'' ChromeGames (talk · contribs) 17:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Civil War (2024 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Mike  Allen   17:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Good work
Well done, Sunni Paiya. Your contributions on Jigarthanda DoubleX has really enriched that article 24thHusbandofDraupathi (talk) 04:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chamayam (1993 film)


The article Chamayam (1993 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Cannot find substantial sources (so not cursory mentions from The Hindu) to endorse this film's notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Longhornsg (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Longhornsg. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Mia Schem, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Longhornsg (talk) 05:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'm EmilySarah99. Your recent edit(s) to the page Princess Isabella of Denmark appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Her father is first, her brother is second, she is third. Although it is the 14th of January, the queen is not set to abdicate until 2pm local time. This change should be made then.'' EmilySarah99 (talk) 09:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Vincent of Denmark. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EmilySarah99 (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Just Stop Oil. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. The Mona Lisa protest was by Riposte Alimentaire, not Just Stop Oil. Belbury (talk) 09:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suchana Seth


The article Suchana Seth has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:Not News. Subject is not notable enough to warrant an article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Suchana Seth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suchana Seth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suchana Seth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello, I just want to mention that edit summaries are really helpful to other editors. I notice you rarely use them. Could you consider adding edit summaries to your edits? Thank you! Masterhatch (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

An Ordinary Case moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to An Ordinary Case. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and has not been shown by a source to have entered production per WP:NFF. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY 2008 12:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Stub articles
Hi Sunuraju. I really admire your interest in building the encyclopedia. But I am not sure what utility these is to the stub articles you are creating. If you are not interested in developing a full profile of these films then perhaps it would best to leave another user to create them. Because the stubs honestly feel more like you're spamming them out. And, I hope I am not being impolite, but some of the phrasing and innaccuracies are worrying. I wish I could cleanup every one of these stubs but I don't have the time to familiarise myself with each film enough to provide an accurate and full representation. Again, I mean no offense and I'm not trying to tell you what to do. Just something to consider. Οἶδα (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


 * ok Sunuraju (talk) 03:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bastar: The Naxal Story
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bastar: The Naxal Story, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Sunuraju&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1214137449 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bastar:_The_Naxal_Story&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1214137449%7CBastar:%20The%20Naxal%20Story%5D%5D Ask for help])

Deletion discussion about Murder of Fawziyah Javed
Hello Sunuraju, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Murder of Fawziyah Javed, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Murder of Fawziyah Javed.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

microbiology Marcus [petri dish·growths] 10:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

42nd Hong Kong Film Awards
Hi Sunuraju, I appreciate your updates on the 42nd Hong Kong Film Awards. However, please ensure that when updating an awards ceremony, you not only change "pending" to "won", but also update the losing categories to "nom", while providing sources for verification and updating the biography section. Otherwise, other users will have to clean it up, and it would be better to have a fully completed update rather than leaving it halfway done for someone else to finish. Thanks again for your contributions and have a great day! ——  Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ）  16:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gabriel de Leon


The article Gabriel de Leon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🥒 Greenish Pickle! 🥒 (🔔) 22:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of An Ordinary Case for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article An Ordinary Case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/An Ordinary Case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop
Please do not add citations to sentences that are not supported by the sources. It degrades the text–source integrity and verifiability of the article. If you plan to add a statement supported by a source, cite the source in the same edit as the addition of the statement, not before it. Nardog (talk) 12:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Here, you added this source to the sentence In October 2022, Emanuel urged several businesses to stop working with rapper Kanye West over his antisemitic comments. It says nothing about October 2022 or Kanye West. Here, you added this source to the sentence However, for unknown reasons, the film will not be shown theatrically in Canada. It says nothing about Canada.

Why are you doing this? Please stop it immediately because you're making the encyclopedia worse. Nardog (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

This source you added makes no mention of Macy's. Enough is enough. Nardog (talk) 05:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Sunuraju. Thank you for your work on Kid Snow. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Grammar, punctuation, and sourcing
Hello, I notice that you state on your user page that you have "grammar problems". What this suggests is that you should take exceptional care when editing. I've reviewed a number of your recent edits, and they frequently lack proper punctuation or ignore existing punctuation. You also recently added a third source to a sentence that already had two valid sources. It is not necessary to add citations to material that is already clearly and appropriately cited; it only makes the task of reading the article harder for the general readership of the encyclopedia. Please don't add sources to already sourced material, unless the claims are extraordinary and have been challenged by other editors. Please use the 'Preview' button to review your edits before publishing them. Please be mindful while editing to take into account the existing grammar and punctuation of the text surrounding your edits. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucija Begić


The article Lucija Begić has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, any notability should be covered by Miss Croatia"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sciencefish (talk) 10:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Again, punctuation
With this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dance_of_Flags&diff=prev&oldid=1227744244 You added a sentence to the article, but did not end the sentence with a period. This is a near constant occurence. Always put a period or "dot" at the end of a sentence. Also, when adding references, there should be no space after the punctuation and the start of the reference, and as well, when you add an additional reference, there should not be a space between the two references. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 23:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Please remove non-existent template
The non-existent template "Vinayan" has been added to more than thirty articles. Please self-revert these additions. If the template is ever created, then add it; pushing a redlinked template into live article space isn't appropriate. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 17:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Please follow the manual of style for adding citations to articles
Please review WP:MOS, specifically

Ref tags () are used to create footnotes (sometimes called endnotes or just notes), as citation footnotes and sometimes explanatory notes. All ref tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies, with no intervening space. Refs are placed after adjacent punctuation, not before (apart from the exceptions below). Adjacent ref tags should have no space between them, nor should there be any between ref tags and inline dispute/cleanup templates.. Thank you. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you recently removed content from Desperate Lies without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop inserting spaces that are not appropriate per the Manual of Style
I'm practically begging you at this point. I've tried repeatedly to get you to conform your edits to standard. Virtually every time you add a reference to an article, you either add a space between the end of a sentence and the reference, or a space between consecutive references. This means that for virtually all such edits, another editor has to clean up your error. As I quoted above from the Manual of Style, there is a standard in place here. You can look at almost any article on Wikipedia, and if there are references, there is NO space between the end of a sentence and a reference, or between consecutive references. Please. This should not be difficult to conform to.

This is correct: This is NOT correct:
 * " something something. "

I have asked you to conform to this standard several times. Please adjust your editing behavior. Thank you. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 23:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I see you've done a number of edits today, all of them conforming to the Manual of Style standard regarding references. Thank you very much for doing so. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)