User talk:Supacalafrajalistic/Archive 1

September 2012
Hello, I'm JuneGloom07. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Neighbours characters without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - JuneGloom    Talk  18:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm JuneGloom07. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of Neighbours characters (2012) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Also, please beware that non-free images of characters shouldn't be inserted into the list - JuneGloom    Talk  14:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Neighbours characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloom    Talk  22:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm M.Mario. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — M.Mario  (T/C) 19:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Neighbours characters (2012), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloom    Talk  21:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Neighbours characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natasha Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm SQGibbon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kourtney Kardashian without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SQGibbon (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a gossip magazine
Please read the important policy on WP:Biographies of living persons which includes: "'Contentious material about living persons... that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.'" JohnCD (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dylan Patel
Hello Supacalafrajalistic,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dylan Patel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Mabalu (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lord Disick


The article Lord Disick has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This page is the recreation of the Scott Disick article which by consensus is now a redirect. Also, the "Lord" appellation is not explained in the text and is likely a hoax or joke.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SQGibbon (talk) 18:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lord Disick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lord Disick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lord Disick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SQGibbon (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lord Disick


A tag has been placed on Lord Disick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cindy ( talk to me ) 18:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saath Nibhaana Saathiya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Forgot to put name (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Skai Jackson. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MadGuy7023 (talk) 22:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Neighbours characters (2013), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please stop removing the spin-off from the infobox and playing around with images. - JuneGloom    Talk  19:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Could you please explain this edit to Lauren Carpenter? Why fiddle about with the image and change the name to Amber when her name is quite clearly Lauren?! That edit to me looks like vandalism and there's no excuse for it. You have been a member of Wikipedia long enough now to know that if you want to experiment you make use of the sandbox. You do not experiment with live articles. If you carry on this way then you may find that you end up getting blocked from editing.  Any questions please ask me on my talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Your recent editing history at Callum Jones shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. – anemone projectors – 15:37, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ramsay Street, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''Please stop removing content or adding events that have not happened yet on-screen. Wait for the episode to be broadcast.'' - JuneGloom    Talk  20:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Neighbours characters, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Please stop adding unsourced dates. Priya appears beyond 1 April.'' - JuneGloom    Talk  17:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cheryl Cole, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Rain  the 1  17:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Ramsay Street does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - JuneGloom    Talk  20:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Theme to Neighbours, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Rain  the 1  20:49, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Rani
Hi. Not every child in the same school year group is born in the same year. Rani could have been born in either 1997 or 1998. Perhaps Rani will celebrate her birthday on-screen in the next few months, then we'll have a concrete source for her birth date. - JuneGloom    Talk  22:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Steph Scully
What were you thinking adding that terrible screenshot of Steph Scully? That to me looks like you are were having a joke - it was a terrible choice to identify the character. Rain  the 1  22:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I can understand you wanting to try new things - but that is what the sandbox is there for and not main space articles. I do not mind you editing at all - you live and learn on Wikipedia and it can take time to get it right. Rain  the 1  17:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)