User talk:Supdawg1011

Reliable sources
Hi there, re: these changes, please stick to reliable mainstream sources, like major newspapers, magazines, and sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. I doubt you're in a position to defend how Rajnikantvscidjokes.in would in any way qualify as a reliable news organisation. Also, we do not use Wikipedia as a reference, because it is user-contributed and thus, inherently flawed. Other examples of insufficient user-generated sites: Blogs, discussion forums, news comment sections, IMDb (yes, even IMDb.) Please see WP:UGC for more info. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Khaidi No. 150. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Quasar G  t - c 19:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry new to Wikipedia