User talk:SuperClarets82

(loan) should not be in italics
Hello and welcome to wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to football entries. However please note that the word (loan) in football infoboxes should not be in italics. The agreed standard for football player infoboxes is the Wikipedia Football Project Player Manual of Style. Please could you follow this standard. Thank you. Peanut4 (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible second account
Are you Simon nelson? You both edit Burnley F.C. articles and have applied similar infobox edits that go against the standards of WP:FOOTY. If you are this user, please note that having more than one Wikipedia account is generally not allowed. Please read WP:SOCK to ensure that you are not violating Wikipedia's terms of use. If you are not this user then please accept my apologies. --Jameboy (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Eddie Anaclet
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Eddie Anaclet is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Eddie Anaclet saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Eddie6705 (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Edit Summary
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:  The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.  glennb28   t/ c    21:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Youth clubs in infoboxes
Hi, I noticed you removed the youth clubs information from Cameron Jerome's infobox while updating his under-21 appearances. In future, please don't remove such information, it is as important a part of the player's history as his previous adult clubs. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Removal of content warning
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Struway2 (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Removal of under-21 stats
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. ''Please do not remove under-21 international appearances from infoboxes, as you did with Ehiogu. Thankyou.'' Jameboy (talk) 15:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Removal of youth information from infoboxes
Hi, Please could you explain why you persist in removing youth club information from players' infoboxes? You're doing so much good constructive editing in terms of tidying up infoboxes and keeping player stats up to date that it doesn't make sense for you to spoil it by removing useful, valid content. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. John Hayestalk 00:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. John Hayestalk 00:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 08:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Final warning
If you persist in removing perfectly valid information from infoboxes without discussion, without edit summary and against the concerns raised above by the community, I will block you from editing. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked your account for repeated blanking of material without explanation. If this is what's required to get your attention, then, sadly, so be it.

If you resume this behaviour on the expiry of the block, you will be blocked indefinitely. --Dweller (talk) 16:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)