User talk:SuperFlash101/Archive 4

FLC
can you review the Featured list candidates/List of Family Guy cast members/archive1.-- Pedro J. the rookie 21:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

THanks a lot flash.-- Pedro J. the rookie 23:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

responded to all concerns.-- Pedro J. the rookie 23:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

responded new concern :)-- Pedro J.  the rookie 00:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Done.....those the text of the top seems familiar a bit of dajabuo:)-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey can you teach me how you do all those P and F episodes it would come in handy for the future.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Where do you find so much info and do it good i see that you are doing the beach P&F episode.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Okay i willsee, and that episode could get to GA easy:).-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Man your good, danm i wish youd be in FG but at least your in doh.:)-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

hey could you review Featured article candidates/Lisa Simpson/archive1 Pedro J. the rookie 21:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

revied jerk du soleil.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

And remember that thing that you told me for editing articals could you help me on the prodducction section and i reviewed your GA.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

When you told me about how to edit an episode artical you told me about the reception but can you tell me about the producction thats what i can never find for episodes, oh and i can see you only need one more GA to make spider man season 1 to GT congrats.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure any time, one more quest is there any way to find dvd features on the internet?-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Did as you asked on the review.-- Pedro J.  the rookie 01:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

reviewed your last GA on spidey.-- Pedro J. the rookie 23:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

HEy can you review Patriot Games (Family Guy) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro thy master (talk • contribs)

Also reviewd the P&F mummy artical looks great man you have a gift for atricals.-- Pedro J. the rookie 19:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Responded.-- Pedro J. the rookie 21:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

One more thing i ssee you do P&Fs episodes in nyour sandbox and one of my favorite is Swinter if you do not mind can you tell me when you are going to start as i am a desney participant, iam a fan of P&F plus i woulsd like to see your magic in action:)-- Pedro J. the rookie 22:38, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Freat if you need help i will help you disney is an insperation for me and not helping makes me feel bad so any artical you need help with tell me.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Responded.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Responded again:)-- Pedro J. the rookie 01:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

/* Dan Povenmire */
 Mahanga Talk 05:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The image was relicensed. Check my talk page. Regards,  Mahanga Talk 19:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

GA review
Hi. I'm sorry I haven't had time review one of your articles yet (I've been sick since Thursday). I'll review Destination: Imagination sometime next week.  The left orium  16:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I feel better now. The fever went away yesterday. :)  The left orium  16:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * For sure! I'll get to it on Monday. :) C T J F 8 3  chat 23:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Review is done. If you get to it within an hour or so, I'll be able to look at the fixes, otherwise I won't be till tomorrow (no rush though) C T J F 8 3  chat 22:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * *Tag* for the review C T J F 8 3  chat 22:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL, I just meant like "tag, you're it" for your response on the GA review page C T J F 8 3  chat 22:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL, I was vague I should've linked to Tag (game). Anyways, looks good, passing. C T J F 8 3  chat 23:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Destination: Imagination/GA1.  The left orium  16:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Supernatura Season 1
Hey. I've renominated Supernatural (season 1) for FA. Can you take a look when you get the chance? Ophois (talk) 12:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support. However, I want to add back the region 4 DVD info onto the page, as I just suggested on the nomination page. If that's fine with you, can you please list so, as your support is based on a version not having it. Ophois (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror
Hello! Your submission of Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Note, I've also started a GA review for Phineas and Ferb's Quantum Boogaloo and will try to do some of the others... —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  19:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I also would like to say good job. I've actually gone and watched the first five eps of PnF after seeing some of your articles.  I watch them with my 5 year old nephew, and I think the show is aimed more at me (I'm 35) than him.  It's very smart. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 23:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I've finished the last half of my GAN review... —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  01:06, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a pass! Nice job! —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  23:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jerk De Soleil
Hello! Your submission of Jerk De Soleil at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

List of Supernatural episodes
Hey, do you have experience with featured lists? If so, could you please take a look at Featured list candidates/List of Supernatural episodes/archive1? Thanks. Ω pho  is  23:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Dan Provenmire
I've sent him a message. Hope we get a positive response. Amandajm (talk) 06:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Christmas Vacation
WP:CRYSTAL only applies for "unverifiable speculation," oddly enough some people thought their pushes were good enough for Wikinews too. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

swampy
File:Jeff "Swampy" Marsh.jpg. There you go.  Mahanga Talk 17:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Rugrats and sidebar
Thanks for doing that; I think it will be very helpful. Later today I'll proofread the sidebar Pitch (filmmaking); I noticed a few small things I can easily fix. I don't have any more suggestions to make about the Rugrats article. Good luck with it. Finetooth (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Supernatural Season 2
Hey, I've nominated the second season for FAC here. Can you take a look when you get the chance? Thanks. Ω pho  is  22:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Check it
- hey i notice you made phnineas and ferb and makeing perry(good job) can you check this page as i am tryin to get it to GA but some pepole do not like it so what do you think.-- Pedro J. the rookie 00:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

One thing do you own P&F DVDs?-- Pedro J. the rookie 01:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Ti see if you could give me some producctionof an episode iam working on-- Pedro J. the rookie 18:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Quest do you now which episode am iam working on —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro thy master (talk • contribs)

Doh it was soposed to be a secret, ah well i thought you where working hard so helping in some episode would be nice, plus P&F is one of my favorite DISNEY cartoons:)-- Pedro J. the rookie 18:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks good luck on perry the platitpus grgrggrgrgrggrgr :)-- Pedro J.  the rookie 18:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Now i do not mean this in the wrong way but HOW IN WIKIPEDIA WORLD DO YOU WORK SO FAST, its amaising man yestorday you where starting and now boom its done you have to show me how you do that.LuCk:)-- Pedro J.  the rookie 12:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to say i can not find nothing of recep o n S'Winter sorry :/-- Pedro J. the rookie 13:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah looked on IGN on tv guide on tv squad nothing-- Pedro J. the rookie 16:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * hey i'm planing on puting FG for FA but its on PR can you review it PR.LuCk-- Pedro J. the rookie 20:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Quest do you think i could publish the swinter artical, iit seems i can't find any recep so i think it would be a good idea to publiush itg so at least i can do other episodes and see if the episode has recep.-- Pedro J. the rookie 02:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Worry not my friend i'll keep it up.-- Pedro J. the rookie 13:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Perry Platypus piggy bank.jpg
It's not free, it's a derivative work. It needs a fair use rational. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 05:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Perry the Platypus
Wow! You are amazing. Is this because of Thanksgiving break? I cant wait to see what you do during Christmas break xP Blake (Talk·Edits) 13:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Ferb Fletcher GAR
Nice work on the Ferb Fletcher article! I've reviewed it for GA and left comments on the GAR page. Liqudluck ✽ talk 03:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your responses. I have just a few more comments/responses, so I lumped them together under the heading last stretch. Liqudluck ✽ talk  22:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * A different source than the youtube one, and I'm ready to pass. Liqudluck ✽ talk  00:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of Without (The X-Files)
Without (The X-Files) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. talk 16:01, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

The Doof
I'm starting to work on an article for the Big D in my userspace, wanna help me gather up enough info for an article? ViperSnake151  Talk  22:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

fAVOR
hOope iam not bothering you with thease favors but Can you review this artical Featured list candidates/Family Guy (season 5)/archive2.PS congrats on FErb.-- Pedro J. the rookie 01:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thankls ever need anything ask for it(posible for someone my age) also good luck with Dan Provinme, LuCk.-- Pedro J. the rookie 02:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * No presure sure you are busy(me iam....doing nothing) remember to review the FLC please-- Pedro J. the rookie 16:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * responded to most all of your concerns-- Pedro J. the rookie 17:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * REPHRASE THAT: finished all your concerns-- Pedro J. the rookie 23:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey i do not want to bug you with all the f avors but can you review the FAC of Family Guy-- Pedro J. the rookie 15:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Perry the Platypus
Hello! Your submission of Perry the Platypus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 07:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, Flash. Congrats on you work for Perry the Platypus and several others! I need to ask you if you could help improve the SpongeBob SquarePants article. I have tried my best to improve it, but it is getting little attention and little work. Your excellent editing skills would be quite helpful for the article. Thank you. Phil Fry (talk) 16:29, 04 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for responding! Some suggestions:
 * I have tried my best to expand the lead. If it looks a little cluttered, feel free to fix it.
 * The section "Tenth anniversary" needs to be expanded quite a bit. This is a big moment in SpongeBob history, yet there is nothing but a poorly-written paragraph.
 * The "Staff" section needs to be converted to prose.
 * The "Voice actors" section needs more sources. Do you think you could upload some cast photos?

Thank you. Phil Fry (talk) 09:33, 05 December 2009 (UTC)

The Chinese Restaurant
Hi, would you be kind enough to support again on my "The Chinese Restaurant" article? It was archived way to early :S. Thank you.-- Music 26/  11  19:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Protection
I protected those pages you wanted. The vandalism is coming from a specific IP range. If it continues after the one week of protection, contact me and I'll look into a possible range block for the ip addresses. Happy editing,  Malinaccier ( talk ) 22:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Cartman Gets an Anal Probe
The image you are adding to the above article does not have a sufficient fair use rationale. Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 06:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Cartman's obesity can be seen in the video - we don't need another image for that
 * Cartman's farting is only partially a visual element (and certainly "farting fire" can be described using words)
 * It is debatable that we need another fair use image in the article just to demonstrate the alien probe - we would need a stronger reason than this, IMO.

Re: Jeff "Swampy" Marsh
I know, yes, sorry. My internet just about died a short while ago, so I have a very, very limited connection right now. I've already looked over the article, I just need to publish the review. My internet should be back up within the next few hours, so the review should be up then, or tomorrow at the very latest. :) — 97198 (talk) 11:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Done - Talk:Jeff "Swampy" Marsh/GA1. — 97198 (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

GA review
Can you do a GA review for My World (Justin Bieber album) Candyo32 (talk) 01:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks :) Candyo32 (talk) 02:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I made the corrections, and about the Part I thing, Part II of the album is slated for a March 2010 release, and for now there is not enough available information to know whether Part II will be combined with this article or if it will warrant an article of its own. Thanks for everything!! Candyo32 (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Perry the Platypus Good Article Review
I've reviewed Perry the Platypus which you nominated for GA review. I've made a few spelling changes (I'm not sure encircles->involves is the best word, but it's clearer). I'm going to Mark it as having achieved GA (my first GA review). Thank you for nominating it. RJFJR (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm still typing the review. I wrote the message here first. (You might want to look at how I filled in the form and let me know if that was how I was supposed to do it.) RJFJR (talk) 16:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that's everything: Template on talk page that it passed, added to good article list, you removed it from the nom page, reivew written (and reviewed). I guess it's done.  (The first time I tried to do a GA review I gave up because I couldn't figure out if the images had proper licensing!  After that I wasn't sure I was ever going to try again.) RJFJR (talk) 16:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Supernatural FAC
Supernatural (season 2) has been renominated here. Ω pho  is  16:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:Request
Hey Flash. I wish I had better news for you, but I couldn't find any ratings info from that episode, or much of any ratings coverage for that season of Rugrats. I know finding ratings info for cable television shows can be a challenge, especially from episodes so far back, so I wish I could be of more help. I also looked for news articles about that episode in general and didn't find too many, but that doesn't mean a lot; the Lexis database seems to be lacking in articles going back to that time. Best of luck to you, let me know if I can do anything more. I took a look at the article thus far in your sandbox and it's looking good so far! —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  18:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, by not many, I meant...not any. lol. I found a number of articles mentioning Reptar, but not "At the Movies" specifically. I'll try to sift through the Reptar ones and see if any pertain to this episode, and if I find any I'll shoot them over to you... —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  19:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry Flash, things have been hectic with the holidays. I'm sorry to report, however, that I've been able to turn up exactly nada on the Spidey ratings. As I said, ratings are always tricky. I'd actually suggest you go to "TV by the Numbers" and look through their old cable ratings reports to see if they have anything. As sad as it is, they usually have more detailed stuff than the mainstream media when it comes to the Nielsen Ratings... —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  23:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Foster's FLC phail.
Hm, apparently after a month and a bit of doing the hoop jumping as asked by others it isn't enough to get yourself a FL promotion. Don't know what the major flaw is, maybe it's that whole redlink nonsense which chewed up several hours to no avail or the lack of attention near the end. Eitherway, the closure was right but not the decision (unilateral might I add) of a fail. Feh, try once more in a month or so? treelo radda  20:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me — that's quite a bummer. A month sounds good; in the meantime, we should try and chop down the redlinks, as for some reason that's what got everyone in such a fickle and stopped them from supporting. Thanks for all your help throughout the FLC, BTW!  The Flash  {talk} 20:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know, there was a lot of gnashing of teeth coming from both sides with neither making a convincing argument. The point is that redlinks shouldn't be the thing upon which a FLC is decided upon given how stupefyingly contentious it is for the editors making assessments. In principle it'd be good to create stubs for those with redlinks using sourcing already present as establishment of notability but then you'd have permastubs with little to no ability to expand so it's a tradeoff between a whole bundle of bluelinks linking to articles containing little more than the list already states or leave the links out and the people remain articleless. Also, you know you can't be in a fickle given it's a adjective not a noun right? treelo  radda  20:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see what you mean. I suppose, as several editors were requesting it, it'd simply be the best thing to do, despite the fact that most of the info is already on the list. And, yes, I apologize, that was a grammar mistake on my part.  The Flash  {talk} 20:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The Great Wife Hope
Hi there. A GAR has been posted for The Great Wife Hope. I am notifying you as you are the nominator. Thanks -- Nyxaus (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Xmas Vacation page
AFAIK, we should really get the Xmas Vacation page cleaned up for tomorrow, since it's going to be a DYK on Christmas for Big Bad Voodoo Daddy's appearance in the episode. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

GA review
Can you do a GA review for My World (Justin Bieber album) Candyo32 (talk) 01:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks :) Candyo32 (talk) 02:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I made the corrections, and about the Part I thing, Part II of the album is slated for a March 2010 release, and for now there is not enough available information to know whether Part II will be combined with this article or if it will warrant an article of its own. Thanks for everything!! Candyo32 (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I got all the refs fixed now. Candyo32 (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I tried my best on all the refs you listed, and the reason all the main fields are not filled out on some of them is due to some of the information not known. Candyo32 (talk) 19:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, the accessdate & publisher are filled out for all of them. Candyo32 (talk) 05:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your help! Candyo32 (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I was wondering when you review that, could you review another one I just finished One Less Lonely Girl also? Feel free to take as much time as you need! Thanks alot, again! Candyo32 (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Jeffrey Dean Morgan
Which image do you think is better here? Personally, I think the first one creates a better contrast between the actor and the character of John Winchester, although the second one is more close up. Ω pho  is  01:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * True, but since it's so close up, it is similar to the infobox image. If someone wanted to, they could argue that the closeup should be used instead of the infobox, so I think it could be argued to be kept if the first is used because it creates a greater contrast. What do you think? Ω  pho  is  02:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Review
Hi! Since you helped me so much the last time, I was wondering if you had some extra time could you do a GA review on One Time. Thanks! :) Candyo32 (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks again! Candyo32 (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Mom! Phineas and Ferb made me an encyclopedia article!
I'm gonna start working on an article for Candace Flynn. If a page were done for here, we'd pretty much have all the major A-plot characters done, care to help? ViperSnake151  Talk  17:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * User:ViperSnake151/Candy. ViperSnake151   Talk  17:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't mind, this is what it's for. ViperSnake151   Talk  18:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

I changed you dyk hook - please check
Hi, I changed your dyk hook here to comply with the max 200 characters rule. Would you please check to see if it is ok? Thanks, — mattisse  (Talk) 15:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Can I have your autograph??? ;)
Nicely done, my friend. lol And thanks for your support at the P&R GT! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  23:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Wow, that was fast...
I guess they don't call you the Flash for nothing! lol. That was the fastest GAN review I've ever seen! I think I've got all the concerns at Dances with Smurfs. Let me know. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. warrior 4321  23:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
warrior 4321  23:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror
Hey Flash. I'd really like to help you out here, but I'm a bit concerned that simply relisting it for GAN one day after it failed isn't the best way to do it. I think the proper channel we're supposed to go through in situations like this is to relist it at WP:GAR and say you disagree with the way the review was carried out, so you'd like another review. I would make some changes based on the GAN review (which you maybe have already done), list it at WP:GAR, tell them you object to it being closed so quickly without an attempt to work through some of the prose issues, and tell them you have an editor willing to review it immediately if you could relist it for WP:GA. That's me. :) If you do that, I will be willing to review it the second it is up for GAN again. What do you think? —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  00:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I suppose if you make a pretty thorough copy edit (not just the suggestions from the failed GAN, since that was only at the start of the article) and relist it in a few days, that'd be fine. I'll review it, but I might also like to seek input from the guy who failed it too, just to be sure. Don't get me wrong, I'll review it, and if he says its not ready but I say it is, I'll pass it, but I think we should try to be as fair and democratic about it as possible... —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  02:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm saying I will do the review. However, I may also ask that editor to take a look at it and see if he's satisfied, just so he can provide some input. I'd still be the one doing the review, so it'd be up to me if I pass it or not, but he might have some useful input. It's just a thought; I could also just do the review myself, doesn't matter to me... —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  03:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Tom's Rhinoplasty
I think I've addressed your GAN concerns. As for "Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror", it's really up to you. I don't think it would hurt to get a professional look at it, but if you'd rather not, I had promised I'd review it and I'll keep my word on that. (By the way, I know I don't have to tell you this, but I just want to say for the record that we're not talking about a quid-quo-pro, "I'll review your article if you'll review mine" thing here, right? That wouldn't be right) —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  02:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think I got the last two items. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Raging Bully/GA1
Hey. I have offered a review and placed the article on hold for now. Feel free to contact me on my talk page once you've dealt with the issues raised. J Milburn (talk) 00:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Promoted. I see you have a few other similar articles up, so, due to your quick and positive response, I will look into reviewing them for you too. I can also offer thoughts if you're considering taking it to FAC- I can give you some pointers now, or feel free to contact me if it is nominated. J Milburn (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Rugrats image
Another flickr user finally replied to my request. File:Bugs & Rugs Walk of Fame Stars.jpg. Not sure if you still need this one. (You'll obviously need to crop it). Regards,  Mahanga Talk 16:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

A Proposition
Hello Flash. First off, have you ever seen Code Monkeys? The reason is because I've been planning on making articles out of the episodes and since you're good at making great episode articles, I thought that you might help me. Here's the list of the episodes. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought not. That's it got cancelled after two seasons. Anyways, I'm happy to know that you can help. I just hope I have enough time to start the first episode. Also, can you review Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay/archive2? GamerPro64 (talk) 01:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you look for reviews for any of the 26 episodes? I've seem to not have found any. I mean, what is an episode article without articles? GamerPro64 (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunatly, the New York Times review is more of a series than an episode review. Also, I think instead to make List of Code Monkeys episodes a Featured List or something like that. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Now that sounds like a plan, Flash. Hopefully, I can start tomarrow. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review Flash. But, how do I improve the rationale? GamerPro64 (talk) 03:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Let My Babies Go!: A Passover Story
Hello! Your submission of Let My Babies Go!: A Passover Story at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <I>NativeForeigner</I> Talk/Contribs 06:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK
The article is ready for DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 22:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:At the Movies (Rugrats)/GA1
I've left a review and placed the nomination on hold. I'm not as sure about this one as your last, for the reasons I note on the review page. I do feel it has potential to hit GA, but I think it needs a little work. J Milburn (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, I'll keep it on hold indefinitely- good luck! J Milburn (talk) 21:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: One Time GA review
Hey Flash, very, very sorry for the delay! I was working on other stuff and got off track with correcting the article for about the week. But I think I have gotten the concerns out of the way! Candyo32 (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Happy SuperFlash101's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 00:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Let My Babies Go!: A Passover Story
SuperFlash, I was about to promote the DYK submission Let My Babies Go!: A Passover Story, but first wanted to inquire whether you would have issue with the page being move to Let My Babies Go! A Passover Story as there does not appear to be a need for both the exclamation mark and full colon. Searches for the book appear to just use the colon, while the exclamation mark in the title appears to take care of any need for the additional colon. Thanks in advance. Calmer  Waters  06:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:15, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:DanSwampyAward.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DanSwampyAward.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)