User talk:SuperFurryBoy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joan Cwaik has been accepted
 Joan Cwaik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Programming Geek talk to me 15:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Joan_Cwaik help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Joan Cwaik


The article Joan Cwaik has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joan Cwaik


A tag has been placed on Joan Cwaik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:55, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Joan Cwaik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joan Cwaik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joan Cwaik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Any other accounts
Hello. This account's contributions are quite unusual for someone who until yesterday had only made 3 edits, and I suspect that it is linked to other accounts. Have you edited using other accounts?

If so, could you please do the right thing and divulge all of the other accounts?

Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I only made one article because I find that it is very difficult to contribute in Wikipedia. I spent days doing an article and it took three months or more to be approved. I considered it was too much effort and the waiting was too long to keep on editing. As you can see, I didn't made another contribution again. When I was notified about this nomination I was really annoyed I started to read the steps I had to follow to take part of the discussion. It took me a while to understand. Wikipedia is fool of tutorials so I don't understand what's the unusual thing here. The only thing I see is that I don't feel comfortable. I spent a lot of time writing an article trying to achieve all the requirements, I waited a lot to know if it was ok or not and a couple of years after someone says it must be deleted. What's the point of all of this? Kind regards SuperFurryBoy (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)