User talk:SuperHappyPerson

Welcome!

Hello, SuperHappyPerson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your contributions at Articles for Deletion
Thank you for your recent contributions to Articles for Deletion. Your arguments are welcomed in helping to resolve the workload at this section of Wikipedia. However, can I suggest that you would be more effective in the following two ways: Hope this helps your contribution to Articles for Deletion! If you have any questions please feel free to ask me on my talk page, or to ask another Wikipedian for help. And welcome to Wikipedia! - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * (a) Provide a unique wording for your argument in each debate. When editors see the same argument (in this case "Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability") made in a large number of AfDs, they can be inclined to think you are applying a template rather than considering each article on its merits.  Using different wording is a good way to show you have individually considered each matter you're commenting on.
 * (b) Cite policy. I assume that by "qualifications for notability" you mean WP:N, but you may also be referring to one of a range of other relevant policies.  It helps to say which policy you're referring to, and to explain why you feel the particular article does not meet it.  Sometimes this results in saying basically the same thing again and again in debate after debate - but you'll get a better outcome and your views will be given a greater weight.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Papania
Please don't alter the archived discussions on AfD. They should be kept intact and unchanged unless there is a reason for removing it. The discussion needs to stay in place so that if someone recreates the article it in the future, we can refer to the previous results of the deletion discussion. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 02:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
—Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 03:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Sara Hurwitz AFD
I'm planning on withdrawing my deletion vote as notability was established. Do you want to take over my nomination or should I close it as a keep? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Silver seren C 21:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/SuperHappyPerson for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)