User talk:SuperJamesX

Welcome!
Hello, SuperJamesX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Hinds County, Mississippi did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello SuperJamesX. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SuperJamesX. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 00:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey, actually Theleekycauldron vandalized the “Lilly Pulitzer” article for no reason, and she should be very ashamed of herself for what she has done. There was nothing wrong with the article until she vandalized it on August 5, 2022. SuperJamesX (talk) 00:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The article was inappropriately promotional and contained lots of unsourced statements, which are against Wikipedia's core policies: WP:NPOV and WP:V. There was a lot wrong with that article and Theleekycauldron fixed it. MrOllie (talk) 00:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Exodus 20:16 in the Bible says that you shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor, and yet you are blaming me for a serious mistake Theleekycauldron actually made, and she did not fix it, she just vandalized it. I was the one fixing it, and do not blame people for your own mistakes. Man, the world has gone woke these days… SuperJamesX (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And I am for real telling you the truth! SuperJamesX (talk) 01:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Theleekycauldron. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Southern United States, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 01:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Georgia's 6th congressional district.  General Ization Talk  23:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Collin County, Texas, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


 * There was nothing wrong with Collin County booming from a rural county into one of the most populous counties in Texas and the United States. Counties booming in population are very interesting stories to talk about. SuperJamesX (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

2023 Ole Miss Rebels baseball team moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 2023 Ole Miss Rebels baseball team. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Ole Miss Rebels baseball team (April 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Ole Miss Rebels baseball team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:2023_Ole_Miss_Rebels_baseball_team Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2023_Ole_Miss_Rebels_baseball_team reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia
You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Morgan Wallen. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed. S Philbrick  (Talk)  11:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. And stop using hostile and insulting language in edit summaries as you did here,. signed, Willondon (talk) 17:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * You just want to keep on downgrading the Morgan Wallen article, especially that widely known controversy with him canceling his second Oxford Show, don’t ya? When an important event happens, it must be known to the world, it cannot be just hidden and forgotten information. SuperJamesX (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * And you are the one vandalizing the Morgan Wallen article! SuperJamesX (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Country pop has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Mapei (rapper), you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 22:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I’m so fricking done with your COMPLETE, FAKE Woke tales! SuperJamesX (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Bruh, what the fuck is wrong with you?! SuperJamesX (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

SuperJamesX (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2023 Ole Miss Rebels baseball team


Hello, SuperJamesX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 Ole Miss Rebels baseball team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  01:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)