User talk:SuperSeafire

File source problem with File:BBC_Radio_York's_X685_POG,_Museum_Gardens,_York_on_Friday_25th_September_2009.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:BBC_Radio_York's_X685_POG,_Museum_Gardens,_York_on_Friday_25th_September_2009.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Linking dates
Hello SuperSeafire, I see you've been busy linking lots of dates in Wikipedia articles. I'd like to draw your attention to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, and particularly to the part about linking dates, from which it seems pretty clear to me that the links you have made to dates are inappropriate, at least as far as the ones I've seen are concerned. I just thought I'd let you know, before you spend too much time on it. As it is, I have already removed the links you added to dates in the article for Chester. However, you did add some useful links in that article, which remain, though you need to be careful which words you link, and how you link them. For example, you added separate links for "Odeon" and "cinema". While I think it would be fair to say that there is no need to link the word "cinema" on its own, a more useful link for the word "Odeon" would have been this one, since it takes the reader to a page about Odeon Cinemas, rather than to one about anything called "Odeon". I hope that helps. If you have any queries about what I've said, or disagree with my removal of most of your links from the Chester article, then start a new paragraph or section here on your talk page, type followed by what you want to say, and someone will be along soon to help you out. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eddie Brown Tours


A tag has been placed on Eddie Brown Tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  15:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Dead railways
I see another dead railway heading off from Pilmoor towards Norton/Malton. Is that written up here yet? &mdash; RHaworth 17:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy Lewis


A tag has been placed on Daisy Lewis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

RAF Acaster Malbis
Good Afternoon SuperSeafire

I am currently attempting to get the RAF Acaster Malbis article up to B class quality and you added this book "Abraham, Barry. Post-War Yorkshire Airfields" but no page numbers were included that i could see. Would be possible for you to have a look through the book and see which pages Acaster Malbis is mentioned?

Thank you. Gavbadger (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harry Peacock (actor)


The article Harry Peacock (actor) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Bit parts in a few movies does not satisfy WP:NACTOR, can not find any significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J04n(talk page) 21:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)