User talk:SuperSucker

 List of all IPs (randomly assigned to my internet connections: mostly my home and mobile phone) I used when contributing at Wikipedia since I was banned



Hello, my name is [top secret], living in England since 2016.


 * these are all my contributions since registering the account (however, I did contribute without being logged in at Wikipedia: those contribs are mentioned above)
 * if you wonder why I sign my wikimedia uploads with a different username please read these 14 logs (in short, your signature doesn't have to be your actual username, because the history logs report it already)

The basics
 New user: A lot to read.  Stats: 250 million views per day.  The prototype of the fundamental principles: When introduced, IAR was a personal and slightly hilarious policy.  The 5 fundamental policies: When introduced, the 5th pillar didn't exclude the former 4.

??
Here to build an encyclopedia??--Moxy (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks as it has already been.But I'm here just to help contribute. SuperSucker (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks as if you are spending most of your time here pulling other editors away from their work. If this continues I will have to block your account from editing per WP:IAR. ~Awilley (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * We3lcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSucker (talk • contribs) 19:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Block evasion
Per your comment here, you were at the IPs that have been editing at Gender differences in suicide and Epidemiology of suicide.

Per this and this you are currently under a 1 week block, and you should honor that. That block was given to you, personally. It is good that you finally logged in, but your use of this account now is WP:BLOCKEVASION and I have removed your edits. When your block has expired please continue to use the logged in account. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per the above. The original block was per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Gender differences in suicide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jytdog (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Courcelles (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Consider this block to also be for repeated use of IP addresses to edit the same pages as your account, in violation of WP:SCRUTINY. Courcelles (talk) 23:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive979 - Alexis Jazz 21:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Global rename unblock request (per my activity uploading images at commons.wikimedia.org and WP:UNCONF policy on confusing usernames)
Since someone at Administrators'_noticeboard (I'm not able to edit at AN/ANI since I'm blocked) raised the "old username usurpation" argument, may I point to this. "The user may wish to re-create the old account to prevent impersonation." It clearly would be a preferred venue then, in case username usurpation is the issue, to take SuperSucker (either myself or an admin/steward) as soon as I'm renamed to Sundaymorning1999, or even better Xyz0123456789, or any casually decent, appropriate username (and obviously re-blocked at wikipedia). However, I don't mind the renaming being denied. It's ok. SuperSucker (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC) Note: by this username on suicide prevention topics, it's like if User:CandyShop (perfectly acceptable username) is very active on dental surgery topics, or worse, on childhood diseases, then wishing to change it to set down possible delusional interpretations.. ..(can't think of a better metaphor now). In simple words, username SuperSucker conveys some implied funny sexual connotation, while suicide prevention most likely shouldn't but seriousity. So it's uneasing. SuperSucker (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)