User talk:Super ninja2/Archive 1

Welcome to the Teahouse!
from: Elsa Enchanted (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

My guestbook
{{tmbox }}
 * type     = notice
 * image    = Writer's barnstar.png
 * imageright= Guestbook barnstar.png
 * small    = {{small|}}} / = yes
 * style    = width: 427 px
 * textstyle = color: black; font-weight: bold
 * text     = Thanks for signing my guestbook! You earned these! Oh, and by the way, I am a little younger than you, and I play the piano. It is very hard, and you have to practice a ton. It took me about a year to learn one of my Mozart pieces. Also, not everyone has talent. Kudos,  Peter   Sam   Fan  01:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * well, I will never give up my dream ^_^ I'm sure I'm gonna make it true whatever happened! And I've a question, since when have you started learning music and Piano? And how old are you? Just to have an idea if I'm late coz I heard that people start learning music since 6. And thank you for these barnstars ☺ shorouq★kadair 👱 03:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I won't tell you my current age, but I began when I was 4 or 5.  Peter  Sam   Fan  16:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Signing your posts correctly
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * U|Cordless Larry I actuelly did sign all contents I added by using four tildes but I dont know why it says "Preceding unsigned comment added by ....", do you have any idea how can I fix that and why it happens? shorouq★kadair 👱 11:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I actually suspected that might be the case. Try going into your preferences, and unticking the "Treat the above as wiki markup" box. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * U|Cordless Larry oh thank you so much it worked! shorouq★kadair 👱 (talk) 04:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Property-header-100-480x270.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Property-header-100-480x270.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100Things to Do Before High School SH.png
 Thanks for uploading File:100Things to Do Before High School SH.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Property-header-100-480x270.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Property-header-100-480x270.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:The-Legend-of-Snow-White-SH.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The-Legend-of-Snow-White-SH.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Political speech article
I redirected your page Political speech to a subsection of the Freedom of speech article. This seems like probably the best place to put that content right now. Thanks so much for trying to help build up encyclopedia :) TonyBallioni (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Foothills mall logo SH.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Foothills mall logo SH.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Get blake logo SH.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Get blake logo SH.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Moomal Khalid
Hello Super ninja2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Moomal Khalid, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you.  So Why  11:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Talk:The Commitments (film)/GA1
Super ninja2, you opened this GA review a few weeks ago, but your only comment was that "the article is kind of short", and you haven't returned since. This leads me to believe that you either don't understand what conducting a GA review involves or don't know what the Good Article criteria are. I notice that you don't have any prior experience with working on or reviewing Good Articles, and indeed have only 200 edits under your belt at this point, and no more than a few on any particular article.

By opening the review, you were committing to conducting a complete GA review. If you just meant to make a single comment on the article's length, then you shouldn't have opened the review; instead, that's the sort of comment that goes either on the article's talk page, or that you add to a review that has been opened by another reviewer.

Under the circumstances, I would recommend that you get a great deal more experience in writing articles and take an article of your own through the GA process before conducting your own reviews. A GA is not merely about length: that criterion has more to do with the broadness of the topic coverage. However, there's also grammar and prose, reliable sourcing and avoiding close paraphrasing and plagiarism, manual of style issues, image licensing, and so on. You should be checking the cited sources to be sure the article reflects what's in the sources, making sure the article has a neutral point of view, and so on.

If you don't plan to conduct a thorough and timely review based on the GA criteria, please let me know; I can arrange to have the nomination placed back in the pool of articles waiting for a reviewer. Thank you for your interest in the GA process. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OK K.O.! Let&#39;s Be Heroes logo SH.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:OK K.O.! Let&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OK K.O.! Let&#39;s Be Heroes logo SH.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:OK K.O.! Let&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to LGBT rights in Jordan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Regards
Hi, Super ninja2. I'm not sure if leaving a message irrelevant to specific articles is the appropriate on this page, so I'll just make it brief: I'm an Arabic learner and I randomly clicked into your username in arwiki - then I read what you wrote on your user page here. I was glad to have a chance knowing your respectable beliefs and interests, and I hope no matter how big the obstacles are, you can always be what you want to be. Best luck!! Kou Dou 06:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

reply
please if you have concern about my edits discuss it in the talking page, Any unsourced material will be removed. Thank you --Mojackjutaily (talk) 08:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

don't be child, please stop vandalism.--Mojackjutaily (talk) 17:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Children's names in the infobox
Regarding this, I reverted because, as noted in my edit summary, we don't add the names to the infobox unless the kids are notable. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Angelo Rules
I undid a bunch of edits created by a blocked IP vandal editor. If you have sources for the info you are re-adding please specify where you are getting the info from, the IP is not trusted as an authority. It would be great get more info for that article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Geraldo Perez the info I added in last edit were added accidentally. I wanted to fix the codes by clicking on an old version and unexpectedly I re-added them. Sorry for that mistake. Shorouq★The★Super★ninja2 (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Stop edit warring at Ukraine
Stop your edit warring at Ukraine. Per WP:BRD, if you make an edit against the status quo and another editor reverts you, then YOU must start a discussion on the Talk Page and build a WP:CONSENSUS for your change BEFORE you insert your change again. You are violating Wikipedia's rules to do otherwise. --Taivo (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * User:TaivoLinguist So strange when you tell me that and then revert my edit! You kept reverting all the time! Stop reverting edits if you don't want to involve in an edit war!!! The term "occupied" hints at the existence of an opposing view of Russia's policy. Shorouq★The★Super★ninja2 (talk) 02:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * YOU are the one in violation of Wikipedia policy. Read WP:BRD.  If you make an edit of the status quo text and another editor reverts you, then you MUST initiate a discussion on the Talk Page and build a consensus for your edit BEFORE you edit again.  I am perfectly within my rights to revert your edit until you build a consensus for your change.  You've been around a while, you should know that.  --Taivo (talk) 02:31, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
- MrX 🖋 11:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Your multiple attempts to change the fact that Russia interfered in the US elections to "alleged" have been noted and reverted. Our content is based on what RS say, and the consensus of RS and editors is that Russia did, in fact, interfere. Only Russia, Trump, and some GOP politicians, deny this. Most GOP politicians accept this as proven fact.
 * Don't try to do this again, or you'll just get in trouble and likely blocked. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 15:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You also violated the page editing restrictions. If you do that again, I will request that you be sanctioned.- MrX 🖋 16:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * User:BullRangifer Firstly, you don't tell me what to do! And what reliable sources do you mean? Do you mean ABC News, the American biased news agency? I think that the first paragraph of RS says: "making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)." therefor I think that RT and Sputnik should be considered too, considering that these agencies are, in fact, reliable sources!

"Only Russia, Trump, and some GOP politicians, deny this." I would say that only the US and its alliances say that Russia did interfere. Stop talking like its a proven fact! The Muller investigation found that there is No collusion! Shorouq★The★Super★ninja2 (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg HickoryOughtShirt?4 • RexxS
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Necrothesp
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bratsche • Kyle Barbour • Kzollman • Madman

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Pharos

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Primefac

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Reaper Eternal

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment concluded that creating pages in the portal namespace should be restricted to autoconfirmed users.
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Technical news
 * XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration
 * In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically.  All current administrators have been notified of this change.
 * Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous
 * A request for comment is currently open to amend the community sanctions procedure to exclude non XfD or CSD deletions.
 * A proposal to remove pre-2009 indefinite IP blocks is currently open for discussion.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
 * An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
 * An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news
 * The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion.  You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
 * Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution!  The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous
 * The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
 * The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • 1 • Flyguy649 • 2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
 * 1 's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
 * 2 's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg 28bytes • WJBscribe • Wizardman

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg MSGJ • TheDJ

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox • BU Rob13 • DoRD

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox • BU Rob13 • DoRD • GB fan

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment seeking to alleviate pressures on the request an account (ACC) process proposes either raising the account creation limit for extended confirmed editors or granting the account creator permission on request to new ACC tool users.
 * In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
 * The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
 * The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
 * A request for comment seeks to determine whether Office actions should be a policy page or an information page.

Technical news
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous
 * In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop . This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)